Literature DB >> 10508516

Mre11 and Ku70 interact in somatic cells, but are differentially expressed in early meiosis.

W Goedecke1, M Eijpe, H H Offenberg, M van Aalderen, C Heyting.   

Abstract

Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) pose a major threat to living cells, and several mechanisms for repairing these lesions have evolved. Eukaryotes can process DSBs by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ connects DNA ends irrespective of their sequence, and it predominates in mitotic cells, particularly during G1 (ref. 3). HR requires interaction of the broken DNA molecule with an intact homologous copy, and allows restoration of the original DNA sequence. HR is active during G2 of the mitotic cycle and predominates during meiosis, when the cell creates DSBs (ref. 4), which must be repaired by HR to ensure proper chromosome segregation. How the cell controls the choice between the two repair pathways is not understood. We demonstrate here a physical interaction between mammalian Ku70, which is essential for NHEJ (ref. 5), and Mre11, which functions both in NHEJ and meiotic HR (Refs 2,6). Moreover, we show that irradiated cells deficient for Ku70 are incapable of targeting Mre11 to subnuclear foci that may represent DNA-repair complexes. Nevertheless, Ku70 and Mre11 were differentially expressed during meiosis. In the mouse testis, Mre11 and Ku70 co-localized in nuclei of somatic cells and in the XY bivalent. In early meiotic prophase, however, when meiotic recombination is most probably initiated, Mre11 was abundant, whereas Ku70 was not detectable. We propose that Ku70 acts as a switch between the two DSB repair pathways. When present, Ku70 destines DSBs for NHEJ by binding to DNA ends and attracting other factors for NHEJ, including Mre11; when absent, it allows participation of DNA ends and Mre11 in the meiotic HR pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10508516     DOI: 10.1038/13821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  71 in total

1.  DNA damage-dependent nuclear dynamics of the Mre11 complex.

Authors:  O K Mirzoeva; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Rap1-independent telomere attachment and bouquet formation in mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Harry Scherthan; Agnel Sfeir; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11(ts) allele confers a separation of DNA repair and telomere maintenance functions.

Authors:  M Chamankhah; T Fontanie; W Xiao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficiency of nonhomologous DNA end joining varies among somatic tissues, despite similarity in mechanism.

Authors:  Sheetal Sharma; Bibha Choudhary; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Frédéric Baudat; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Meiotic recombination and spatial proximity in the etiology of the recurrent t(11;22).

Authors:  Terry Ashley; Ann P Gaeth; Hidehito Inagaki; Allen Seftel; Maimon M Cohen; Lorinda K Anderson; Hiroki Kurahashi; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A mechanism of palindromic gene amplification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Alison J Rattray; Brenda K Shafer; Beena Neelam; Jeffrey N Strathern
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Up-regulation of the Ku heterodimer in Drosophila testicular cyst cells.

Authors:  Alexander M Boutanaev; Lyudmila M Mikhaylova; Dmitry I Nurminsky
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 9.  DNA damage and repair during lymphoid development: antigen receptor diversity, genomic integrity and lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  Nahum Puebla-Osorio; Chengming Zhu
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.829

10.  Deletion of Ku70, Ku80, or both causes early aging without substantially increased cancer.

Authors:  Han Li; Hannes Vogel; Valerie B Holcomb; Yansong Gu; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.