Literature DB >> 17672157

Demineralized bone matrix composite grafting for posterolateral spinal fusion.

Alexander R Vaccaro1, Harrison A Stubbs, Jon E Block.   

Abstract

In a prospective series, the 24-month fusion status was evaluated radiographically among patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral lumbosacral spinal fusion. Seventy-three patients had a diagnosis of degenerative disk disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis and had supplemental bone grafting with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) putty (Grafton DBM; Osteotech, Eatontown, NJ) enriched with aspirated bone marrow (DBM bone marrow), DBM putty combined with iliac crest autograft (DBM autograft), or autograft. Overall, approximately 63% (12 of 19) of DBM bone marrow, 70% (19 of 27) of DBM autograft, and 67% (18 of 27) of autograft patients were fused at 24 months (P = .875). These findings suggest that both DBM composites offer similar performance to autograft in posterolateral spinal fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672157     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20070701-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  22 in total

Review 1.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Free vascularised fibular grafting with OsteoSet®2 demineralised bone matrix versus autograft for large osteonecrotic lesions of the femoral head.

Authors:  Yong Feng; Shanzhi Wang; Dongxu Jin; Jiagen Sheng; Shengbao Chen; Xiangguo Cheng; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Nitin Kukkar; Kevin Sharif; Benjamin J Main; Christine E Albers; Saadiq F El-Amin Iii
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

4.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 5.  New Strategies in Enhancing Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Karim Shafi; Chelsie Jacques; Sohrab Virk; Sravisht Iyer; Matthew Cunningham
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-02

6.  Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Morris; Sandip P Tarpada; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Allografts: expanding the surgeon's armamentarium.

Authors:  Jan Brune; Tu-Lan Vu-Han; Norus Ahmed; Volker Eras; Axel Pruß; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 1.522

8.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Propensity-Matched Medicare Outcome Analysis.

Authors:  Syed I Khalid; Ravi S Nunna; Rachyl M Shanker; Kyle B Thomson; Rown Parola; Owoicho Adogwa; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 9.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Sotirios Christodoulou; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

Review 10.  Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; M S Nickoli; J C Wang; J R Lieberman; H S An; S T Yoon; J A Youssef; D S Brodke; C M McCullough
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.