Literature DB >> 17671091

Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation.

Rodrigo Bermejo1, Ylli Doksani, Thelma Capra, Yuki-Mori Katou, Hirokazu Tanaka, Katsuhiko Shirahige, Marco Foiani.   

Abstract

DNA topoisomerases solve topological problems during chromosome metabolism. We investigated where and when Top1 and Top2 are recruited on replicating chromosomes and how their inactivation affects fork integrity and DNA damage checkpoint activation. We show that, in the context of replicating chromatin, Top1 and Top2 act within a 600-base-pair (bp) region spanning the moving forks. Top2 exhibits additional S-phase clusters at specific intergenic loci, mostly containing promoters. TOP1 ablation does not affect fork progression and stability and does not cause activation of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase. top2 mutants accumulate sister chromatid junctions in S phase without affecting fork progression and activate Rad53 at the M-G1 transition. top1 top2 double mutants exhibit fork block and processing and phosphorylation of Rad53 and gamma H2A in S phase. The exonuclease Exo1 influences fork processing and DNA damage checkpoint activation in top1 top2 mutants. Our data are consistent with a coordinated action of Top1 and Top2 in counteracting the accumulation of torsional stress and sister chromatid entanglement at replication forks, thus preventing the diffusion of topological changes along large chromosomal regions. A failure in resolving fork-related topological constrains during S phase may therefore result in abnormal chromosome transitions, DNA damage checkpoint activation, and chromosome breakage during segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17671091      PMCID: PMC1935030          DOI: 10.1101/gad.432107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  69 in total

1.  Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53.

Authors:  A A Alcasabas; A J Osborn; J Bachant; F Hu; P J Werler; K Bousset; K Furuya; J F Diffley; A M Carr; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Topoisomerase II can unlink replicating DNA by precatenane removal.

Authors:  I Lucas; T Germe; M Chevrier-Miller; O Hyrien
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events.

Authors:  L H Hartwell; T A Weinert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Transcriptional consequences of topoisomerase inhibition.

Authors:  I Collins; A Weber; D Levens
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Genome-wide distribution of ORC and MCM proteins in S. cerevisiae: high-resolution mapping of replication origins.

Authors:  J J Wyrick; J G Aparicio; T Chen; J D Barnett; E G Jennings; R A Young; S P Bell; O M Aparicio
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Location and characterization of autonomously replicating sequences from chromosome VI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Shirahige; T Iwasaki; M B Rashid; N Ogasawara; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells/.

Authors:  C S Downes; D J Clarke; A M Mullinger; J F Giménez-Abián; A M Creighton; R T Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Completion of replication map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III.

Authors:  A Poloumienko; A Dershowitz; J De; C S Newlon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis.

Authors:  A Schwacha; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  80 in total

1.  Fork rotation and DNA precatenation are restricted during DNA replication to prevent chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Stephanie A Schalbetter; Sahar Mansoubi; Anna L Chambers; Jessica A Downs; Jonathan Baxter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Regulation of rtt107 recruitment to stalled DNA replication forks by the cullin rtt101 and the rtt109 acetyltransferase.

Authors:  Tania M Roberts; Iram Waris Zaidi; Jessica A Vaisica; Matthias Peter; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions.

Authors:  John L Nitiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Structural basis for the MukB-topoisomerase IV interaction and its functional implications in vivo.

Authors:  Seychelle M Vos; Nichole K Stewart; Martha G Oakley; James M Berger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress: Jigsaw Falling into Place.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kotsantis; Eva Petermann; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Cohesion by topology: sister chromatids interlocked by DNA.

Authors:  Rodrigo Bermejo; Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  The Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loader determines the distribution of cohesin on budding yeast chromosomes.

Authors:  Igor Kogut; Jianbin Wang; Vincent Guacci; Rohinton K Mistry; Paul C Megee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription.

Authors:  Sandie Tuduri; Laure Crabbé; Chiara Conti; Hélène Tourrière; Heidi Holtgreve-Grez; Anna Jauch; Véronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Aubin Thomas; Charles Theillet; Yves Pommier; Jamal Tazi; Arnaud Coquelle; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Lee; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-20

10.  Bimodal recognition of DNA geometry by human topoisomerase II alpha: preferential relaxation of positively supercoiled DNA requires elements in the C-terminal domain.

Authors:  A Kathleen McClendon; Amanda C Gentry; Jennifer S Dickey; Marie Brinch; Simon Bendsen; Anni H Andersen; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.