Literature DB >> 11713279

Transcriptional consequences of topoisomerase inhibition.

I Collins1, A Weber, D Levens.   

Abstract

In principle, the generation, transmission, and dissipation of supercoiling forces are determined by the arrangement of the physical barriers defining topological boundaries and the disposition of enzymes creating (polymerases and helicases, etc.) or releasing (topoisomerases) torsional strain in DNA. These features are likely to be characteristic for individual genes. By using topoisomerase inhibitors to alter the balance between supercoiling forces in vivo, we monitored changes in the basal transcriptional activity and DNA conformation for several genes. Every gene examined displayed an individualized profile in response to inhibition of topoisomerase I or II. The expression changes elicited by camptothecin (topoisomerase I inhibitor) or adriamycin (topoisomerase II inhibitor) were not equivalent. Camptothecin generally caused transcription complexes to stall in the midst of transcription units, while provoking little response at promoters. Adriamycin, in contrast, caused dramatic changes at or near promoters and prevented transcription. The response to topoisomerase inhibition was also context dependent, differing between chromosomal or episomal c-myc promoters. In addition to being well-characterized DNA-damaging agents, topoisomerase inhibitors may evoke a biological response determined in part from transcriptional effects. The results have ramifications for the use of these drugs as antineoplastic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713279      PMCID: PMC100007          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8437-8451.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  70 in total

1.  Transport of torsional stress in DNA.

Authors:  P Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  c-myc expression is activated by the immunoglobulin kappa-enhancers from a distance of at least 30 kb but not by elements located within 50 kb of the unaltered c-myc locus in vivo.

Authors:  J Mautner; U Behrends; K Hörtnagel; M Brielmeier; W Hammerschmidt; L Strobl; G W Bornkamm; A Polack
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1996-03-21       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Rapid induction of c-fos transcription reveals quantitative linkage of RNA polymerase II and DNA topoisomerase I enzyme activities.

Authors:  A F Stewart; R E Herrera; A Nordheim
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Nucleosomal structures of c-myc promoters with transcriptionally engaged RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  T Albert; J Mautner; J O Funk; K Hörtnagel; A Pullner; D Eick
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Involvement of DNA topoisomerase I in transcription of human ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  H Zhang; J C Wang; L F Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Different topoisomerase II antitumor drugs direct similar specific long-range fragmentation of an amplified c-MYC gene locus in living cells and in high-salt-extracted nuclei.

Authors:  I I Gromova; B Thomsen; S V Razin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Activation of topoisomerase II-mediated excision of chromosomal DNA loops during oxidative stress.

Authors:  T K Li; A Y Chen; C Yu; Y Mao; H Wang; L F Liu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Transforming growth factor-beta1 stimulates multiple protein interactions at a unique cis-element in the 3'-untranslated region of the hyaluronan receptor RHAMM mRNA.

Authors:  F M Amara; J Entwistle; T I Kuschak; E A Turley; J A Wright
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The immunoglobulin heavy chain locus control region increases histone acetylation along linked c-myc genes.

Authors:  L Madisen; A Krumm; T R Hebbes; M Groudine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Expression of normal and translocated c-myc alleles in Burkitt's lymphoma cells: evidence for different regulation.

Authors:  D Eick; G W Bornkamm
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  50 in total

1.  Cotranscriptional exon skipping in the genotoxic stress response.

Authors:  Martin Dutertre; Gabriel Sanchez; Marie-Cécile De Cian; Jérôme Barbier; Etienne Dardenne; Lise Gratadou; Gwendal Dujardin; Catherine Le Jossic-Corcos; Laurent Corcos; Didier Auboeuf
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Elongation by RNA polymerase II on chromatin templates requires topoisomerase activity.

Authors:  Neelima Mondal; Ye Zhang; Zophonias Jonsson; Suman Kumar Dhar; Madhu Kannapiran; Jeffrey D Parvin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A positive role for c-Abl in Atm and Atr activation in DNA damage response.

Authors:  X Wang; L Zeng; J Wang; J F L Chau; K P Lai; D Jia; A Poonepalli; M P Hande; H Liu; G He; L He; B Li
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  An 8 nt RNA triggers a rate-limiting shift of RNA polymerase II complexes into elongation.

Authors:  Aaron R Hieb; Sean Baran; James A Goodrich; Jennifer F Kugel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage.

Authors:  Yves Pommier; Juana M Barcelo; V Ashutosh Rao; Olivier Sordet; Andrew G Jobson; Laurent Thibaut; Ze-Hong Miao; Jennifer A Seiler; Hongliang Zhang; Christophe Marchand; Keli Agama; John L Nitiss; Christophe Redon
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  2006

6.  Topoisomerase II, not topoisomerase I, is the proficient relaxase of nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  Javier Salceda; Xavier Fernández; Joaquim Roca
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  In vivo dynamics of RNA polymerase II transcription.

Authors:  Xavier Darzacq; Yaron Shav-Tal; Valeria de Turris; Yehuda Brody; Shailesh M Shenoy; Robert D Phair; Robert H Singer
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  The FUSE/FBP/FIR/TFIIH system is a molecular machine programming a pulse of c-myc expression.

Authors:  Juhong Liu; Fedor Kouzine; Zuqin Nie; Hye-Jung Chung; Zichrini Elisha-Feil; Achim Weber; Keji Zhao; David Levens
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Complex regulation and function of activation-induced cytidine deaminase.

Authors:  Janet Stavnezer
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 16.687

10.  Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) can target both DNA strands when the DNA is supercoiled.

Authors:  Hong Ming Shen; Ursula Storb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.