Literature DB >> 17668228

Predictive validity of an age-specific MET equation among youth of varying body size.

Eric E Wickel1, Joey C Eisenmann, Gregory J Welk.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to cross-validate the age-specific Freedson MET equation among children and adolescents of varying body size. Sixty-seven children (41 boys; 26 girls) between 6 and 13 years completed five 3-min trials (1.6, 3.2, 4.0, 4.8, and 6.4 km h(-1)) on a motorized treadmill. During each trial, participants wore an Actigraph accelerometer while oxygen consumption was assessed by indirect calorimetry. Using the Actigraph activity counts, predicted MET values were determined with the age-specific Freedson equation and were compared with measured MET values using dependent t tests. Participants were divided into body size categories based on their calculated body surface area (BSA, m2) (small: BSA<or=0.96 m2; medium: 0.96 m2<BSA<or=1.20 m2; large: BSA>1.20 m2) to determine if body size influenced the difference between measured and predicted MET values. The measured MET value was similar to the predicted MET value at the slowest treadmill speed (1.6 km h(-1)) (2.3 vs. 2.3 METs); however, the measured MET value was lower than the predicted MET value at the remaining speeds (3.2, 4.0, 4.8, and 6.4 km h(-1)) (P<0.001). With the exception of the fastest treadmill speed (6.4 km h(-1)), the mean difference between the measured and predicted MET values was greater between the two smaller BSA categories compared to the largest BSA category. The results suggest that the age-specific Freedson child equation significantly overestimates energy expenditure (METs) during locomotor speeds between 3.2 and 6.4 km h(-1). This effect was primary observed among relatively smaller children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17668228     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0531-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  21 in total

Review 1.  Calibration of accelerometer output for children.

Authors:  Patty Freedson; David Pober; Kathleen F Janz
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth.

Authors:  William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Kurt G Clowers; David R Bassett
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-12-01

4.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.

Authors:  S G Trost; D S Ward; S M Moorehead; P D Watson; W Riner; J R Burke
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 2005.

Authors:  Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; James Ross; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Shari Shanklin; Connie Lim; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Howell Wechsler
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.118

6.  Longitudinal changes in distance-running performance of young males.

Authors:  G S Krahenbuhl; D W Morgan; R P Pangrazi
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; K Schmidt-Nielsen; J L Raab
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-10

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Moving on land: an explanation of pedometer counts in children.

Authors:  Joey C Eisenmann; Eric E Wickel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Resting energy expenditure in children and adolescents: agreement between calorimetry and prediction equations.

Authors:  G Rodríguez; L A Moreno; A Sarría; J Fleta; M Bueno
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.324

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of signalment and body conformation on activity monitoring in companion dogs.

Authors:  Dorothy Cimino Brown; Kathryn E Michel; Molly Love; Caitlin Dow
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.156

2.  Compliance with national guidelines for physical activity in U.S. preschoolers: measurement and interpretation.

Authors:  Michael W Beets; Daniel Bornstein; Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.124

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.