Literature DB >> 15503123

Moving on land: an explanation of pedometer counts in children.

Joey C Eisenmann1, Eric E Wickel.   

Abstract

The pedometer has become a popular instrument to measure physical activity in humans. The pedometer records physical activity as a simple, raw measure of ambulatory movement: the number of steps taken. Two fundamental questions of the use of the pedometer in pediatric research are: How many steps do children take in a day? How many steps should children accumulate on a daily basis? This raises the question: is 13,000 steps the same amount of physical activity in a 6-year-old and a 12-year-old, given the difference in body size and stride length? Although previous authors have concluded that the number of steps taken is an equivalent amount of physical activity in children regardless of body size, the conclusion has not been explained by a scientific rationale or on an empirical basis depending on the energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion and body size. One approach to explain this question is allometric scaling, which has long been utilized by comparative physiologists to show the relationships between body size and locomotion in animals from shrews to elephants. The aim of this paper was to use allometric equations, examples from comparative mammalian physiology, and results from previous papers that have examined the cost of locomotion in children to provide a better understanding of the interpretation of the pedometer in pediatric research. We show that empirically derived results confirm to allometric equations that consider the relationship between body size and terrestrial locomotion to cover a given distance at a given speed. Thus, the number of steps taken and the energy expended for a particular task is greater in smaller children. However, if the cost of locomotion is related to one step, animals tend to be equally economical, whether large or small. Therefore, the number of steps taken as measured by a pedometer may be interpreted as an equivalent level of physical activity between a 6-year-old and a 12-year-old, if taken at the same speed. However, the locomotor activities in daily life consist of walking and running up- and downhill, carrying loads, and at varying speeds or work intensities, and this exemplifies the limitations of the pedometer. In conclusion, this paper provides a better understanding of the interpretation of pedometer counts and highlights that the findings depend on the expression of physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15503123     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1227-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  24 in total

Review 1.  Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: current issues, future directions.

Authors:  S G Trost
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.

Authors:  D Hendelman; K Miller; C Baggett; E Debold; P Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Explaining differences in the metabolic cost and efficiency of treadmill locomotion in children.

Authors:  Gail Frost; Oded Bar-Or; James Dowling; Kerry Dyson
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; K Schmidt-Nielsen; J L Raab
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-10

5.  Evidence for and mechanisms of exercise modulation of growth--an overview.

Authors:  D M Cooper
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Longitudinal profiles of oxygen uptake during treadmill walking in able-bodied children: the locomotion energy and growth study.

Authors:  Don W Morgan; Wayland Tseh; Jennifer L Caputo; Daniel J Keefer; Ian S Craig; Kelly B Griffith; Mary-Beth Akins; Gareth E Griffith; Philip E Martin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of children's activities.

Authors:  R G Eston; A V Rowlands; D K Ingledew
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-01

8.  BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Robert P Pangrazi; Charles B Corbin; William J Rutherford; Susan D Vincent; Anders Raustorp; L Michaud Tomson; Thomas F Cuddihy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  The size-independent oxygen cost of running.

Authors:  Daniel J McCann; William C Adams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait?

Authors:  N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Allometric scaling of 6-min walking distance by body mass as a standardized measure of exercise capacity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Victor Zuniga Dourado; Mary Ann McBurnie
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Short-burst interval treadmill training walking capacity and performance in cerebral palsy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kristie F Bjornson; Noelle Moreau; Amy Winter Bodkin
Journal:  Dev Neurorehabil       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.308

3.  Filtering for productive activity changes outcomes in step-based monitoring among children.

Authors:  Michael Wininger; Kristie Bjornson
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Daily and Weekly Rehabilitation Delivery for Young Children With Gross Motor Delay: A Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol (the DRIVE Study).

Authors:  Rachel Ferrante; Sarah Hendershot; Kathy Baranet; Gardenia Barbosa; Helen Carey; Nathalie Maitre; Warren Lo; Jeff Pan; Jill Heathcock
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.049

5.  Predictive validity of an age-specific MET equation among youth of varying body size.

Authors:  Eric E Wickel; Joey C Eisenmann; Gregory J Welk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Exploring Metrics to Express Energy Expenditure of Physical Activity in Youth.

Authors:  Robert G McMurray; Nancy F Butte; Scott E Crouter; Stewart G Trost; Karin A Pfeiffer; David R Bassett; Maurice R Puyau; David Berrigan; Kathleen B Watson; Janet E Fulton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Physical Activity, Blood Glucose and C-Peptide in Healthy School-Children, a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Karina Huus; Linda Åkerman; Anders Raustorp; Johnny Ludvigsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reduction in ambulatory distance from childhood through adolescence: The impact of the number and length of steps.

Authors:  Roseane de Fátima Guimarães; Kapria-Jad Josaphat; Ryan Reid; Mélanie Henderson; Tracie Ann Barnett; Marie-Eve Mathieu
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.103

9.  The contribution of preschool playground factors in explaining children's physical activity during recess.

Authors:  Greet Cardon; Eveline Van Cauwenberghe; Valery Labarque; Leen Haerens; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 6.457

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.