Literature DB >> 17667498

Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial.

Peter Matthiessen1, Olof Hallböök, Jörgen Rutegård, Göran Simert, Rune Sjödahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized multicenter trial was to assess the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage in patients operated on with low anterior resection for rectal cancer and who were intraoperatively randomized to a defunctioning stoma or not. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The introduction of total mesorectal excision surgery as the surgical technique of choice for carcinoma in the lower and mid rectum has led to decreased local recurrence and improved oncological results. Despite these advances, perioperative morbidity remains a major issue, and the most feared complication is symptomatic anastomotic leakage. The role of the defunctioning stoma in regard to anastomotic leakage is controversial and has not been assessed in any randomized trial of sufficient size.
METHODS: From December 1999 to June 2005, a total of 234 patients were randomized to a defunctioning loop stoma or no loop stoma. Loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy was at the choice of the surgeon. Inclusion criteria for randomization were expected survival >6 months, informed consent, anastomosis < or =7 cm above the anal verge, negative air leakage test, intact anastomotic rings, and absence of major intraoperative adverse events.
RESULTS: The overall rate of symptomatic leakage was 19.2% (45 of 234). Patients randomized to a defunctioning stoma (n = 116) had leakage in 10.3% (12 of 116) and those without stoma (n = 118) in 28.0% (33 of 118) (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.9; P < 0.001). The need for urgent abdominal reoperation was 8.6% (10 of 116) in those randomized to stoma and 25.4% (30 of 118) in those without (P < 0.001). After a follow-up of median 42 months (range, 6-72 months), 13.8% (16 of 116) of the initially defunctioned patients still had a stoma of any kind, compared with 16.9% (20 of 118) those not defunctioned (not significant). The 30-day mortality after anterior resection was 0.4% (1 of 234) and after elective reversal a defunctioning stoma 0.9% (1 of 111). Median age was 68 years (range, 32-86 years), 45.3% (106 of 234) were females, 79.1% (185 of 234) had preoperative radiotherapy, the level of anastomosis was median 5 cm, and intraoperative blood loss 550 mL, without differences between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Defunctioning loop stoma decreased the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage and is therefore recommended in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17667498      PMCID: PMC1933561          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  R T Poon; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan; W L Law; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer following the introduction of a colorectal unit.

Authors:  K Smedh; L Olsson; H Johansson; C Aberg; M Andersson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.

Authors:  M T Eriksen; A Wibe; J Norstein; J Haffner; J N Wiig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  K C M J Peeters; R A E M Tollenaar; C A M Marijnen; E Klein Kranenbarg; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  E Rullier; N Le Toux; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; M Parneix; J Saric
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Rectovaginal fistulas after rectal cancer surgery: Incidence and operative repair by gluteal-fold flap repair.

Authors:  Chihiro Kosugi; Norio Saito; Yoshitaka Kimata; Masato Ono; Masanori Sugito; Masaaki Ito; Kazunori Sato; Keiji Koda; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Dehni; R D Schlegel; C Cunningham; M Guiguet; E Tiret; R Parc
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Kin Wah Chu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study.

Authors:  H Graffner; P Fredlund; S A Olsson; J Oscarson; B G Petersson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  284 in total

1.  Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection.

Authors:  Elyamani Fouda; Ayman El Nakeeb; Alaa Magdy; Enas A Hammad; Gamal Othman; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  [Protective stoma after deep anterior rectal resection: pro].

Authors:  A Ulrich; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  I Mantzoros
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Standards, advances and challenges in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Colorectal Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon Walsh; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Impact of anal decompression on anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Diverting stoma with anterior resection for rectal cancer: does it reduce overall anastomotic leakage and leaks requiring laparotomy?

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Ming Zhong; Lu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

8.  When should we add a diverting loop ileostomy to laparoscopic ileocolic resection for primary Crohn's disease?

Authors:  Yong Sik Yoon; Luca Stocchi; Stefan Holubar; Alexandra Aiello; Sherief Shawki; Emre Gorgun; Scott R Steele; Conor P Delaney; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Koichi Tamura; Kenji Matsuda; Shozo Yokoyama; Hiromitsu Iwamoto; Yuki Mizumoto; Daisuke Murakami; Yuki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Anastomotic leak in patients with acute complicated diverticulitis undergoing primary anastomosis: risk factors and the role of diverting loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hoffman; Hadassah Consuegra; Kevin Long; Christopher Buzas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.