BACKGROUND: We investigated the correlation between operative procedures for rectal carcinoma and postoperative rectovaginal fistulas (RVF), and treatment for RVF. METHODS: The medical records of 161 female patients with rectal carcinoma were examined retrospectively with respect to the cause, incidence, and methods of treatment for RVF occurring after rectal cancer operations, and to the outcomes of gluteal-fold flap repairs for RVF. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 16 developed RVF clinically. The incidence of RVF was significantly higher in patients who were anastomosed by the double stapling technique (DST) and had concomitant resection of the vaginal wall. No statistical difference was found between the established diverting ostomy group and the no-stoma group. Six patients recovered by the establishment of a diverting ostomy only. The gluteal-fold flap technique was performed for 5 patients. No RVF recurrences were noted in these 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RVF was higher in the patients who were anastomosed by DST or had concomitant resection of the vaginal wall. Although some RVFs heal with only fecal diversion, for patients in whom RVF is caused by involvement of the vaginal wall in the circular staple or intersphincteric resection, good results are obtained with the gluteal-fold flap repair technique.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the correlation between operative procedures for rectal carcinoma and postoperative rectovaginal fistulas (RVF), and treatment for RVF. METHODS: The medical records of 161 female patients with rectal carcinoma were examined retrospectively with respect to the cause, incidence, and methods of treatment for RVF occurring after rectal cancer operations, and to the outcomes of gluteal-fold flap repairs for RVF. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 16 developed RVF clinically. The incidence of RVF was significantly higher in patients who were anastomosed by the double stapling technique (DST) and had concomitant resection of the vaginal wall. No statistical difference was found between the established diverting ostomy group and the no-stoma group. Six patients recovered by the establishment of a diverting ostomy only. The gluteal-fold flap technique was performed for 5 patients. No RVF recurrences were noted in these 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RVF was higher in the patients who were anastomosed by DST or had concomitant resection of the vaginal wall. Although some RVFs heal with only fecal diversion, for patients in whom RVF is caused by involvement of the vaginal wall in the circular staple or intersphincteric resection, good results are obtained with the gluteal-fold flap repair technique.
Authors: K W A Göttgens; J Heemskerk; W van Gemert; R Smeets; L P S Stassen; G Beets; C G M I Baeten; S O Breukink Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Andrea Balla; Silvia Quaresima; José D Subiela; Mostafa Shalaby; Giuseppe Petrella; Pierpaolo Sileri Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 2.571