Literature DB >> 22643609

The intersection of everyday life and group prenatal care for women in two urban clinics.

Gina Novick1, Lois S Sadler, Kathleen A Knafl, Nora Ellen Groce, Holly Powell Kennedy.   

Abstract

Women from vulnerable populations encounter challenging circumstances that generate stress and may adversely affect their health. Group prenatal care (GPNC) incorporates features that address social stressors, and has been demonstrated to improve pregnancy outcomes and prenatal care experiences. In this qualitative study, we describe the complex circumstances in the lives of women receiving care in two urban clinics and how GPNC attenuated them. Stressors included problems with transportation and child care, demanding jobs, poverty, homelessness, difficult relationships with partners, limited family support, and frustrating health care experiences. Receiving prenatal care in groups allowed women to strengthen relationships with significant others, gain social support, and develop meaningful relationships with group leaders. By eliminating waits and providing the opportunity to participate in care, GPNC also offered sanctuary from frustrations encountered in receiving individual care. Reducing such stressors may help improve pregnancy outcomes; however, more evidence is needed on mechanisms underlying these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22643609      PMCID: PMC3625534          DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  22 in total

Review 1.  Innovative strategies to reduce disparities in the quality of prenatal care in underresourced settings.

Authors:  Michael C Lu; Milton Kotelchuck; Vijaya K Hogan; Kay Johnson; Carolina Reyes
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Taking grounded theory beyond psychological process.

Authors:  Margaret H Kearney
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Closing the Black-White gap in birth outcomes: a life-course approach.

Authors:  Michael C Lu; Milton Kotelchuck; Vijaya Hogan; Loretta Jones; Kynna Wright; Neal Halfon
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Elizabeth Reed; Urania Magriples; Claire Westdahl; Sharon Schindler Rising; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-02

5.  Stress, Allostatic Load and Health of Mexican Immigrants.

Authors:  Robert Kaestner; Jay A Pearson; Danya Keene; Arline T Geronimus
Journal:  Soc Sci Q       Date:  2009-12-01

Review 6.  Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials.

Authors:  David L Olds; Lois Sadler; Harriet Kitzman
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy.

Authors:  Sharon Schindler Rising; Holly Powell Kennedy; Carrie S Klima
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  In a hard spot: providing group prenatal care in two urban clinics.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Lois S Sadler; Kathleen A Knafl; Nora E Groce; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  The role of home-visiting programs in preventing child abuse and neglect.

Authors:  Kimberly S Howard; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

View more
  7 in total

1.  Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Allecia E Reid; Jessica Lewis; Trace S Kershaw; Sharon Schindler Rising; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  In a hard spot: providing group prenatal care in two urban clinics.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Lois S Sadler; Kathleen A Knafl; Nora E Groce; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.372

3.  A Pilot Test of the Everyday Stressors Index-Spanish Version in a Sample of Hispanic Women Attending Prenatal Care.

Authors:  María L Gómez; Kristin Ashford; Ana M Linares; Lynne A Hall
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2015

4.  Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators During Implementation of a Complex Model of Group Prenatal Care in Six Urban Sites.

Authors:  Gina Novick; Julie A Womack; Jessica Lewis; Emily C Stasko; Sharon S Rising; Lois S Sadler; Shayna C Cunningham; Jonathan N Tobin; Jeannette R Ickovics
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Participatory group prenatal education using photonovels: Evaluation of a lay health educator model with low-income Latinas.

Authors:  Susan J Auger; Sarah Verbiest; James V Spickard; Florence M Simán; Mélida Colindres
Journal:  J Particip Med       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Perceptions of pregnant adolescents on the antenatal care received at Ndirande Health Centre in Blantyre, Malawi.

Authors:  Maria Chifuniro Chikalipo; Linda Nyondo-Mipando; Rabecca Chikondi Ngalande; Sadandaula Rose Muheriwa; Ursula Kalimembe Kafulafula
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.875

Review 7.  A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women.

Authors:  Brittany M Byerley; David M Haas
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.