OBJECTIVE: The National Committee on Quality Assurance has determined that all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Our objective was to determine the rate and predictors of DMARD use in a cohort of elderly patients with RA. METHODS: We analyzed health care utilization data for 5,864 Medicare beneficiaries with RA who also participated in a state-run pharmaceutical benefit program in Pennsylvania. Patients with RA were defined as those with at least 3 diagnoses of RA (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 714.xx) at least 1 week apart who were enrolled in these programs for at least 12 months during 1995-2004. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of synthetic or biologic DMARD use in the 12 months after cohort entry. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients filled a DMARD prescription during 12 months of followup. Frequency of DMARD use increased steadily over time: 24% received DMARDs in 1996 compared with 43% in 2003 (P for trend <0.001). Of patients with at least 1 rheumatologist visit, 41% received a DMARD in 1996 compared with 70% in 2003 (P < 0.001). After the introduction of biologic DMARDs in 1998, 6% of all patients with RA received a biologic, including 12% who saw a rheumatologist. Patients ages 75-84 were 52% less likely to receive DMARDs (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 46-58%) and patients ages >or=85 were 74% less likely (95% CI 69-79%) compared with patients ages 65-74. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients in the community with full prescription drug coverage, most patients diagnosed with RA did not receive a DMARD during the 12 months after cohort entry. Older patients and those not seeing a rheumatologist were less likely to receive a DMARD and may provide a target for quality improvement interventions.
OBJECTIVE: The National Committee on Quality Assurance has determined that all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Our objective was to determine the rate and predictors of DMARD use in a cohort of elderly patients with RA. METHODS: We analyzed health care utilization data for 5,864 Medicare beneficiaries with RA who also participated in a state-run pharmaceutical benefit program in Pennsylvania. Patients with RA were defined as those with at least 3 diagnoses of RA (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 714.xx) at least 1 week apart who were enrolled in these programs for at least 12 months during 1995-2004. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of synthetic or biologic DMARD use in the 12 months after cohort entry. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients filled a DMARD prescription during 12 months of followup. Frequency of DMARD use increased steadily over time: 24% received DMARDs in 1996 compared with 43% in 2003 (P for trend <0.001). Of patients with at least 1 rheumatologist visit, 41% received a DMARD in 1996 compared with 70% in 2003 (P < 0.001). After the introduction of biologic DMARDs in 1998, 6% of all patients with RA received a biologic, including 12% who saw a rheumatologist. Patients ages 75-84 were 52% less likely to receive DMARDs (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 46-58%) and patients ages >or=85 were 74% less likely (95% CI 69-79%) compared with patients ages 65-74. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients in the community with full prescription drug coverage, most patients diagnosed with RA did not receive a DMARD during the 12 months after cohort entry. Older patients and those not seeing a rheumatologist were less likely to receive a DMARD and may provide a target for quality improvement interventions.
Authors: Chris Tonner; Laura Trupin; Jinoos Yazdany; Lindsey Criswell; Patricia Katz; Edward Yelin Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Vivian K Kawai; Carlos G Grijalva; Patrick G Arbogast; Jeffrey R Curtis; Daniel H Solomon; Elizabeth Delzell; Lang Chen; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Lisa Herrinton; Liyan Liu; Edward F Mitchel; C Michael Stein; Marie R Griffin Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Gabriela Schmajuk; Amal N Trivedi; Daniel H Solomon; Edward Yelin; Laura Trupin; Eliza F Chakravarty; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sonali P Desai; Alexander Turchin; Lara E Szent-Gyorgyi; Michael Weinblatt; Jonathan Coblyn; Daniel H Solomon; Allen Kachalia Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; John Z Ayanian; Ed Yelin; Tamara Shaykevich; M Alan Brookhart; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christie M Bartels; Amy J H Kind; Carolyn T Thorpe; Christine M Everett; Rachel J Cook; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 5.532