Literature DB >> 17664497

A preventive approach to obstetric care in a rural hospital: association between higher rates of preventive labor induction and lower rates of cesarean delivery.

James M Nicholson1, David L Yeager, George Macones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Annual cesarean delivery rates in North America are increasing. Despite the morbidity associated with cesarean delivery, a safe preventive strategy to reduce the use of this procedure has not been forthcoming. During the 1990s, clinicians in a rural hospital developed a method of care involving prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction. An inverse relationship was noted between yearly hospital rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery. The purpose of our study was to compare cesarean delivery rates between practitioners who often used preventive induction and practitioners who did not, while controlling for patient mix and differences in practice style.
METHODS: Between 1993 and 1997, different hospital practitioners used risk-guided prostaglandin-assisted preventive labor induction with differing intensity. We used a retrospective cohort design, based on the practitioner providing prenatal care, to compare birth outcomes in women exposed to this alternative method of care with those in women not exposed. Multiple logistic regression analysis controlled for patient characteristics and clustering by practitioner.
RESULTS: The exposed group (n = 794), as compared with the nonexposed group (n = 1,075), had a higher labor induction rate (31.4% vs 20.4%, P <.001), a greater use of prostaglandin E2 (23.3% vs 15.7%, P <.001), and a lower cesarean delivery rate (5.3% vs 11.8%, P <.001). Adjustment for cluster effects, patient characteristics, and the use of epidural analgesia did not eliminate the significant association between exposure to this preventive method of care and a lower cesarean delivery rate. Rates of other adverse birth outcomes were either unchanged or reduced in the exposed group.
CONCLUSIONS: A preventive approach to reducing cesarean deliveries may be possible. This study found that practitioners who often used risk-guided, prostaglandin-assisted labor induction had a lower cesarean delivery rate without increases in rates of other adverse birth outcomes. Randomized controlled trials of this method of care are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17664497      PMCID: PMC1934970          DOI: 10.1370/afm.706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  27 in total

1.  PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION.

Authors:  E H BISHOP
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  The downside of cesarean delivery: short- and long-term complications.

Authors:  Carolyn Zelop; Linda J Heffner
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Elective induction of labor: should we make a fuss?

Authors:  Michael Socol
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: an association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Lisa C Kellar; Peter F Cronholm; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  S S Crane; M A Wojtowycz; T D Dye; R H Aubry; R Artal
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions.

Authors:  J D Yeast; A Jones; M Poskin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.

Authors:  S T Seyb; R J Berka; M L Socol; S L Dooley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The effects of mifepristone on cervical ripening and labor induction in primigravidae.

Authors:  C L Elliott; J E Brennand; A A Calder
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section.

Authors:  Avi Ben-Haroush; Yariv Yogev; Jacob Bar; Hagit Glickman; Boris Kaplan; Moshe Hod
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.901

10.  Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance.

Authors:  D C Aron; D L Harper; L B Shepardson; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-24       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Response to letter to the editor E08-5236A.

Authors:  James Maccoll Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Association not causation: what is the intervention?

Authors:  Michael C Klein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa C Kellar; Morghan H Stenson; George A Macones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Morghan H Stenson; Lisa C Kellar; Aaron B Caughey; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The active management of risk in multiparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey; Morghan H Stenson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa Kellar; Ian Bennett; Katie Margo; Joseph Stratton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; João Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.

Authors:  Rachel G Sinkey; Jasmin Lacevic; Tea Reljic; Iztok Hozo; Kelly S Gibson; Anthony O Odibo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.