Literature DB >> 15547519

Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: an association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate.

James M Nicholson1, Lisa C Kellar, Peter F Cronholm, George A Macones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether exposure to an alternative method of care, called the active management of risk in pregnancy at term, was associated with a lower group cesarean delivery rate. STUDY
DESIGN: Active management of risk in pregnancy at term used risk factors for cesarean delivery to guide an increased use of labor induction. A retrospective cohort design was used to compare clinical outcomes of 100 pregnant women who were exposed to active management of risk in pregnancy at term to 300 randomly selected subjects who received standard management.
RESULTS: The 2 groups had comparable levels of prenatal risk. The group exposed to the active management of risk in pregnancy at term exposure group encountered a higher induction rate (63% vs 25.7%; P < .001) and a lower cesarean delivery rate (4% vs 16.7%; P = .01). Findings were similar for both nulliparous and multiparous subgroups. Active management of risk in pregnancy at term exposure was not associated with higher rates of other major birth outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Exposure to the active management of risk in pregnancy at term exposure was associated with a significantly lower group cesarean delivery rate. A prospective randomized trial that involved active management of risk in pregnancy at term exposure is needed to further explore this association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15547519     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  Response to letter to the editor E08-5236A.

Authors:  James Maccoll Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  How to prevent caesarean deliveries deserves more study.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Lisa C Kellar; Peter F Cronholm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-02

3.  Preventive induction of labor: potential benefits if proved effective.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Association not causation: what is the intervention?

Authors:  Michael C Klein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Effect of hyoscine butylbromide first stage of labour in multiparus women.

Authors:  L Sekhavat; S A Karbasi; R Fallah; M Mirowliai
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa C Kellar; Morghan H Stenson; George A Macones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20

9.  A preventive approach to obstetric care in a rural hospital: association between higher rates of preventive labor induction and lower rates of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; David L Yeager; George Macones
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Morghan H Stenson; Lisa C Kellar; Aaron B Caughey; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.