Literature DB >> 17661889

Complexity, risk and simulation in learning procedural skills.

R L Kneebone1, D Nestel, C Vincent, A Darzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A complex chain of events underpins every clinical intervention, especially those involving invasive procedures. Safety requires high levels of awareness and vigilance. In this paper we propose a structured approach to procedural training, mapping each learner's evolving experience within a matrix of clinical risk and procedural complexity. We use a traffic light analogy to conceptualize a dynamic awareness of prevailing risk and the implications of moving between zones. THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT: We argue that clinical exposure can be consolidated by simulation where appropriate, ensuring that each learner gains the skills for safe care within the increasingly limited time available for training. To be effective, however, such simulation must be realistic, patient-focused, structured and grounded in an authentic clinical context. Challenge comes not only from technical difficulty but also from the need for interpersonal skills and professionalism within clinical encounters. PATIENT FOCUSED SIMULATION: Many existing simulations focus on crises, so clinicians are in a heightened state of expectation that may not reflect their usual practice. We argue that simulation should also reflect commonly occurring non-crisis situations, allowing clinicians to develop an awareness of the complex events that underpin clinical encounters. We describe a patient-focused approach to simulation, using simulated patients and inanimate models within realistic scenarios, to ground experience in authentic clinical practice and bring together the complex elements that underpin clinical events. APPLICATIONS: Although our argument has evolved from surgical practice and operating theatre teams, we believe it can be widely applied to the increasing number of health care professionals who perform clinical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661889     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02799.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  21 in total

1.  Newly acquired arthroscopic skills: Are they transferable during simulator training of other joints?

Authors:  Jamie Ferguson; Robert Middleton; Abtin Alvand; Jonathan Rees
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Microcomplications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on duration of surgery and costs.

Authors:  Marco von Strauss Und Torney; Salome Dell-Kuster; Henry Hoffmann; Urs von Holzen; Daniel Oertli; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Teaching procedural skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Richard K Reznick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-17

4.  Teaching medical procedures at your workplace.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Garcia-Rodriguez
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Otologic Skills Training.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Association of Faculty Entrustment With Resident Autonomy in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Gurjit Sandhu; Julie Thompson-Burdine; Vahagn C Nikolian; Danielle C Sutzko; Kaustubh A Prabhu; Niki Matusko; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Defibrillation safety: an examination of paramedic perceptions using eye-tracking technology.

Authors:  Linda Ross; Brett Williams; Malcolm Boyle
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-09-03

8.  Hybrid simulation for knee arthrocentesis: improving fidelity in procedures training.

Authors:  Lynfa Stroud; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Why simulation can be efficient: on the preconditions of efficient learning in complex technology based practices.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 10.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future.

Authors:  B M A Schout; A J M Hendrikx; F Scheele; B L H Bemelmans; A J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.