Linda Ross1, Brett Williams1, Malcolm Boyle1. 1. Department of Community Emergency Health & Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
Objective: The importance of access to early defibrillation for patients in cardiac arrest has been emphasised as a critical part of the chain of survival by resuscitation bodies internationally; as such defibrillation has become a key procedure for many out-of-hospital emergency healthcare providers. However, little research has been undertaken specifically addressing students' safety during defibrillation procedures. The objective of this study was to examine visual and verbal safety checks prior to defibrillation utilising eye-tracking technology. Methods: This was an observational study of student safety during cardiac rhythm analysis, defibrillator charging and immediately prior to defibrillation during a resuscitation attempt using a medium fidelity mannequin. The participants completed two 10 min simulations each requiring three defibrillation attempts. The κ statistic was used to determine the agreement by the student of their perceived safety performance and that viewed in the video. Results: In both scenarios the student's level of agreement for their perceived defibrillation safety performance and what was observed in the video decreased from defibrillation one to three in both scenarios. However, there was agreement in their overall defibrillation safety performance for both scenarios. Conclusions: Student perceptions of their actions during defibrillation are not always an accurate representation of their actual actions. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Objective: The importance of access to early defibrillation for patients in cardiac arrest has been emphasised as a critical part of the chain of survival by resuscitation bodies internationally; as such defibrillation has become a key procedure for many out-of-hospital emergency healthcare providers. However, little research has been undertaken specifically addressing students' safety during defibrillation procedures. The objective of this study was to examine visual and verbal safety checks prior to defibrillation utilising eye-tracking technology. Methods: This was an observational study of student safety during cardiac rhythm analysis, defibrillator charging and immediately prior to defibrillation during a resuscitation attempt using a medium fidelity mannequin. The participants completed two 10 min simulations each requiring three defibrillation attempts. The κ statistic was used to determine the agreement by the student of their perceived safety performance and that viewed in the video. Results: In both scenarios the student's level of agreement for their perceived defibrillation safety performance and what was observed in the video decreased from defibrillation one to three in both scenarios. However, there was agreement in their overall defibrillation safety performance for both scenarios. Conclusions: Student perceptions of their actions during defibrillation are not always an accurate representation of their actual actions. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Allied Health Personnel; Electric Countershock; Emergency Medical Technician; Resuscitation; Safety
Authors: Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan; John E Billi; Bernd W Böttiger; Leo Bossaert; Allan R de Caen; Charles D Deakin; Saul Drajer; Brian Eigel; Robert W Hickey; Ian Jacobs; Monica E Kleinman; Walter Kloeck; Rudolph W Koster; Swee Han Lim; Mary E Mancini; William H Montgomery; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert E O'Connor; Kazuo Okada; Jeffrey M Perlman; Michael R Sayre; Michael Shuster; Jasmeet Soar; Kjetil Sunde; Andrew H Travers; Jonathan Wyllie; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Jasmeet Soar; David A Zideman; Dominique Biarent; Leo L Bossaert; Charles Deakin; Rudolph W Koster; Jonathan Wyllie; Bernd Böttiger Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Vicki R LeBlanc; Russell D MacDonald; Brad McArthur; Kevin King; Tom Lepine Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2005 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Michael W Smith; Melissa A Bentley; Antonio R Fernandez; Gregory Gibson; Sharon B Schweikhart; David D Woods Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 5.721