P Bytzer1, B Lindeberg. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. peter.bytzer@dadlnet.dk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Anxiety before colonoscopy may have adverse consequences and increase requirements for sedation and analgesics. We aimed to examine the effects of adding an information video to our usual preprocedural information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 162 colonoscopy patients were randomly assigned to video (72) or no video (90) groups. Patients in the video group watched a video on colonoscopy procedures and cleansing. The patients' situational anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. Patients rated pain and overall satisfaction related to the procedure. The colonoscopist and the endoscopy nurse, who were blinded to the patient's allocation, completed questionnaires on use of medication, procedure outcome, and their assessments of patient pain and toleration of the procedure. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups concerning situational anxiety (mean STAI-State score 45.0 +/- 13.3 vs. 45.9 +/- 12.9, P = 0.7), rating of pain, tolerability of the procedure, or the willingness to undergo a future colonoscopy. The staff rated the outcomes equally in the two groups. There was no difference in use of midazolam, but patients, who had seen the video used higher doses of fentanyl ( P < 0.02). Situational anxiety ratings were significantly higher in women, and they found the procedure significantly more painful ( P = 0.001) and were less satisfied ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An information video shown to patients preparing for colonoscopy had no impact on tolerability or anxiety. Colonoscopy is less tolerable and more painful for women and this is probably related to a higher degree of anxiety. Endoscopy personnel should be aware of these gender differences and adjust information and medication accordingly.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Anxiety before colonoscopy may have adverse consequences and increase requirements for sedation and analgesics. We aimed to examine the effects of adding an information video to our usual preprocedural information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 162 colonoscopy patients were randomly assigned to video (72) or no video (90) groups. Patients in the video group watched a video on colonoscopy procedures and cleansing. The patients' situational anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. Patients rated pain and overall satisfaction related to the procedure. The colonoscopist and the endoscopy nurse, who were blinded to the patient's allocation, completed questionnaires on use of medication, procedure outcome, and their assessments of patientpain and toleration of the procedure. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups concerning situational anxiety (mean STAI-State score 45.0 +/- 13.3 vs. 45.9 +/- 12.9, P = 0.7), rating of pain, tolerability of the procedure, or the willingness to undergo a future colonoscopy. The staff rated the outcomes equally in the two groups. There was no difference in use of midazolam, but patients, who had seen the video used higher doses of fentanyl ( P < 0.02). Situational anxiety ratings were significantly higher in women, and they found the procedure significantly more painful ( P = 0.001) and were less satisfied ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An information video shown to patients preparing for colonoscopy had no impact on tolerability or anxiety. Colonoscopy is less tolerable and more painful for women and this is probably related to a higher degree of anxiety. Endoscopy personnel should be aware of these gender differences and adjust information and medication accordingly.
Authors: David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Sook Hee Chung; Soo Jung Park; Jong Suk Hong; Jee Young Hwang; Sin Ae Lee; Kyung Ran Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Sung Pil Hong; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: L A Shafer; J R Walker; C Waldman; C Yang; V Michaud; C N Bernstein; L Hathout; J Park; J Sisler; G Restall; K Wittmeier; H Singh Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-01-13 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Chengyue Yang; Vaelan Sriranjan; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; William Poluha; John R Walker; Harminder Singh Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ersin Günay; Elif Doğan Baki; Serdar Kokulu; Sevinç Sarınç Ulaşlı; Gürhan Öz; Olcay Akar; Erman Bağcıoğlu; Mehmet Ünlü Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2015 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.219
Authors: Nauzer Forbes; Millie Chau; Hannah F Koury; B Cord Lethebe; Zachary L Smith; Sachin Wani; Rajesh N Keswani; B Joseph Elmunzer; John T Anderson; Steven J Heitman; Robert J Hilsden Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 9.427