Literature DB >> 17661003

The use of heterospecific scent marks by the sweat bee Halictus aerarius.

Tomoyuki Yokoi1, Dave Goulson, Kenji Fujisaki.   

Abstract

To forage effectively amongst flowers, some bee species utilize olfactory cues left by previous visitors in addition to direct assessment of visual cues to identify rewarding flowers. This ability can be more advantageous if the bees can recognize and use scent marks left by heterospecifics, not just marks left by members of their own species. We conducted field experiments to investigate whether the sweat bee Halictus aerarius avoids visiting flowers of trailing water willow Justicia procumbens emptied by other bee species. We found that H. aerarius rejected the flowers visited by both heterospecifics and conspecifics. They also rejected visited flowers artificially replenished with nectar. Our results demonstrate that social bees outside the Apidae can detect marks left on flowers by heterospecifics but that (on this plant species) they are unable to discriminate against flowers by directly detecting nectar volume. H. aerarius exhibited different rejection rates according to the identity of the previous bee species. We suggest that the frequency of rejection responses may depend on the amount of chemical substances left by the previous bee. In general, the use of scent marks left by previous visitors is almost certainly advantageous, enabling foragers to avoid flowers with depleted nectar levels and thereby improving their foraging efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661003     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-007-0285-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  8 in total

1.  Individually recognizable scent marks on flowers made by a solitary bee.

Authors:  Francis Gilbert; Salma Azmeh; Chris Barnard; Jerzy Behnke; Sarah A. Collins; Jane Hurst; David Shuker
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter?

Authors:  Ulrich Schmitt; Andreas Bertsch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Tracing pollinator footprints on natural flowers.

Authors:  Thomas Eltz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already visited by conspecifics or by other bumblebee species

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Morphology and structure of the tarsal glands of the stingless bee Melipona seminigra.

Authors:  Stefan Jarau; Michael Hrncir; Ronaldo Zucchi; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-01-25

6.  A stingless bee (Melipona seminigra) marks food sources with a pheromone from its claw retractor tendons.

Authors:  Stefan Jarau; Michael Hrncir; Manfred Ayasse; Claudia Schulz; Wittko Francke; Ronaldo Zucchi; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  The identity of the previous visitor influences flower rejection by nectar-collecting bees.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Olfactory eavesdropping by a competitively foraging stingless bee, Trigona spinipes.

Authors:  James C Nieh; Lillian S Barreto; Felipe A L Contrera; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Stingless bees (Melipona scutellaris) learn to associate footprint cues at food sources with a specific reward context.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Roselino; André Vieira Rodrigues; Michael Hrncir
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Hesitation behaviour of hoverflies Sphaerophoria spp. to avoid ambush by crab spiders.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yokoi; Kenji Fujisaki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-10-04

3.  Termites eavesdrop to avoid competitors.

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Ra Inta; Joseph C S Lai; Stefan Prueger; Nyuk Wei Foo; Eugene Wei'en Fu; Michael Lenz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Olfactory eavesdropping between two competing stingless bee species.

Authors:  Elinor M Lichtenberg; Michael Hrncir; Izabel C Turatti; James C Nieh
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Bumblebees can discriminate between scent-marks deposited by conspecifics.

Authors:  Richard F Pearce; Luca Giuggioli; Sean A Rands
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color.

Authors:  Sebastian Koethe; Vivian Fischbach; Sarah Banysch; Lara Reinartz; Michael Hrncir; Klaus Lunau
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.