Literature DB >> 28313149

Do foraging bumblebees scent-mark food sources and does it matter?

Ulrich Schmitt1, Andreas Bertsch1.   

Abstract

The foraging of worker bees of Bombus terrestris visiting artificial feeders in a climatic test chamber was investigated. The behaviour of worker bees visiting rewarding and unrewarding feeders is completely different. Of all flower visits to rewarding feeders 94% are probing-visits, i.e. the bees land on the flower and probe for nectar. In contrast, only 0.3% of all visits to unrewarding feeders are probing-visits, whereas 47% are approach-visits, i.e., the bees approach the feeders without landing. Exchanging feeder discs proves that the signal used for discrimination must be associated with the plastic disc used as landing platform. Most probably it involves scent-marking of the rewarding feeders with components of high and low volatility. The mean foraging efficiency of bees in a scent-marked foraging arena is 5.7 mg sugar/min and drops to 2.8 mg sugar/min after the scent marked discs are replaced by clean ones. Three components generate this drop in foraging efficiency: (1) the between-flower flight time increases, i.e. the bees search for a longer time before landing on flowers, (2) the bees no longer discriminate between rewarding and unrewarding feeders, and (3) the bees probe empty feeders longer than necessary; obviously they expect to find nectar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus; Flower-visit; Foraging-efficiency; Scent marking

Year:  1990        PMID: 28313149     DOI: 10.1007/BF00318545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Nectar Fluorescence under Ultraviolet Irradiation.

Authors:  R W Thorp; D L Briggs; J R Estes; E H Erickson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Remote perception of floral nectar by bumblebees.

Authors:  James H Marden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Bumblebee visits to Impatiens spp.: pattern and efficiency.

Authors:  Makoto Kato
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Why do honeybees reject certain flowers?

Authors:  Peter B Wetherwax
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  [Collecting bees label dried food sources according to fragrance].

Authors:  J A Núñez
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1967-06

6.  Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees.

Authors:  Bernd Heinrich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  The use of heterospecific scent marks by the sweat bee Halictus aerarius.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yokoi; Dave Goulson; Kenji Fujisaki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-07-28

2.  Foraging scent marks of bumblebees: footprint cues rather than pheromone signals.

Authors:  Jessica Wilms; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-08-28

3.  Stingless bees (Melipona scutellaris) learn to associate footprint cues at food sources with a specific reward context.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Roselino; André Vieira Rodrigues; Michael Hrncir
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers.

Authors:  Martin Giurfa; Josué A Núñez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The Stingless Bee Melipona solani Deposits a Signature Mixture and Methyl Oleate to Mark Valuable Food Sources.

Authors:  David Alavez-Rosas; Edi A Malo; Miguel A Guzmán; Daniel Sánchez-Guillén; Rogel Villanueva-Gutiérrez; Leopoldo Cruz-López
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  The effect of caste and reproductive state on the chemistry of the cephalic labial glands secretion of Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Julia Kiefer; Stefan Schulz; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Flower choice by honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): sex-phase of flowers and preferences among nectar and pollen foragers.

Authors:  A Gonzalez; C L Rowe; P J Weeks; D Whittle; F S Gilbert; C J Barnard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A stingless bee (Melipona seminigra) marks food sources with a pheromone from its claw retractor tendons.

Authors:  Stefan Jarau; Michael Hrncir; Manfred Ayasse; Claudia Schulz; Wittko Francke; Ronaldo Zucchi; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Determining the contribution of epidermal cell shape to petal wettability using isogenic Antirrhinum lines.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Rosa Poetes; Ullrich Steiner; Lars Chittka; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemical compounds related to the predation risk posed by malacophagous ground beetles alter self-maintenance behavior of naive slugs (Deroceras reticulatum).

Authors:  Piotr Bursztyka; Dominique Saffray; Céline Lafont-Lecuelle; Antoine Brin; Patrick Pageat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.