Literature DB >> 16739012

Tracing pollinator footprints on natural flowers.

Thomas Eltz1.   

Abstract

Many insects are known to leave lipid footprints while walking on smooth surfaces. Presumably, the deposited substances improve tarsal adhesion. In bumblebees, footprint hydrocarbons also function as scent marks that allow detection and avoidance of recently depleted flowers. I used GC-MS to detect hydrocarbons deposited by bumblebee (Bombus pascuorum) on flowers of Lamium maculatum. In addition to the plants' own cuticular lipids, extracts of corollas that had been visited by bumblebees contained odd-numbered alkenes. The amount of pentacosenes (C25H50) on corollas was linearly related to the number of bumblebee visits, with workers depositing approximately 16 ng per visit (extrapolated to a total of 65 ng of bumblebee cuticular hydrocarbons). Pentacosenes were retained on visited flowers without loss for 2 hr, and probably longer. This and results from flight cage experiments suggest that flower epicuticles retain a chemical record of pollinator visitation, including information on visiting bee species. Continuous footprint accumulation necessitates new explanations concerning the reversibility of "repellent scent marks" of bumblebees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16739012     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-006-9055-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  8 in total

1.  Individually recognizable scent marks on flowers made by a solitary bee.

Authors:  Francis Gilbert; Salma Azmeh; Chris Barnard; Jerzy Behnke; Sarah A. Collins; Jane Hurst; David Shuker
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already visited by conspecifics or by other bumblebee species

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Morphology and structure of the tarsal glands of the stingless bee Melipona seminigra.

Authors:  Stefan Jarau; Michael Hrncir; Ronaldo Zucchi; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-01-25

4.  Evaluation of synthetic hydrocarbons for mark-recapture studies on the red milkweed beetle.

Authors:  Matthew D Ginzel; Lawrence M Hanks
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A comparison of the composition of epicuticular wax from red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) and hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) flowers.

Authors:  D W Griffiths; G W Robertson; T Shepherd; A N Birch; S C Gordon; J A Woodford
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  The identity of the previous visitor influences flower rejection by nectar-collecting bees.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Cuticle characteristics and volatile emissions of petals in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  S. Mark Goodwin; Natalia Kolosova; Christine M. Kish; Karl V. Wood; Natalia Dudareva; Matthew A. Jenks
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.500

8.  Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta).

Authors:  Y Jiao; S Gorb; M Scherge
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total
  18 in total

1.  Reconstructing the pollinator community and predicting seed set from hydrocarbon footprints on flowers.

Authors:  Sebastian Witjes; Kristian Witsch; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The use of heterospecific scent marks by the sweat bee Halictus aerarius.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yokoi; Dave Goulson; Kenji Fujisaki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-07-28

3.  Foraging scent marks of bumblebees: footprint cues rather than pheromone signals.

Authors:  Jessica Wilms; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-08-28

4.  Stingless bees (Melipona scutellaris) learn to associate footprint cues at food sources with a specific reward context.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Roselino; André Vieira Rodrigues; Michael Hrncir
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Interaction of liquid epicuticular hydrocarbons and tarsal adhesive secretion in Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  Stefanie F Geiselhardt; Stefan Lamm; Claudia Gack; Klaus Peschke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Noisy communities and signal detection: why do foragers visit rewardless flowers?

Authors:  Elinor M Lichtenberg; Jacob M Heiling; Judith L Bronstein; Jessica L Barker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Hydrocarbon footprints as a record of bumblebee flower visitation.

Authors:  Sebastian Witjes; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 8.  Signals and cues in the recruitment behavior of stingless bees (Meliponini).

Authors:  Friedrich G Barth; Michael Hrncir; Stefan Jarau
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Plant surface wax affects parasitoid's response to host footprints.

Authors:  Michael Rostás; Daniel Ruf; Vanessa Zabka; Ulrich Hildebrandt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-12

10.  Caterpillar footprints as host location kairomones for Cotesia marginiventris: persistence and chemical nature.

Authors:  Michael Rostás; Mirko Wölfling
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.