Literature DB >> 17659660

Three-dimensional transperineal sonographic characteristics of the anal sphincter complex in nulliparous women.

W-C Huang1, S-H Yang, J-M Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the morphological characteristics and normal biometry of the anal sphincter complex in nulliparous Chinese women using three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound.
METHODS: 3D sonographic data from 55 nulliparous Chinese women (aged 19-38 years) who had no pelvic organ prolapse and no symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction were retrieved from an image dataset and analyzed by offline post-processing. The morphological characteristics of the external and internal anal sphincters, puborectalis muscle and perineal body were assessed in the sagittal, coronal and axial views.
RESULTS: The external anal sphincter had three sonographic components: the circular main body, a subcutaneous part and an extension portion. It was significantly thinner at 12 o'clock than at the 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions. The internal anal sphincter was seen as dark echolucent strips of equal thickness. In the mid-sagittal view, it started from the anal verge and ended at the anorectal junction. The perineal body was an ovoid structure covering the upper margin of the external sphincter, while the puborectalis muscle was banana-shaped in the sagittal view and was located behind the anorectal junction, extending downward along the inferior margin of the posterior external sphincter extension. Sonographic characteristics of the anal sphincter complex did not vary with age, weight, height or body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D transperineal ultrasound clearly demonstrates the spatial relationships of each component of the anal sphincter complex. This should allow standardized measurement of the complex for investigations of its function. Copyright (c) 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17659660     DOI: 10.1002/uog.4083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review.

Authors:  Z Abdool; A H Sultan; R Thakar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Correlation between gross anatomical topography, sectional sheet plastination, microscopic anatomy and endoanal sonography of the anal sphincter complex in human males.

Authors:  S Al-Ali; P Blyth; S Beatty; A Duang; B Parry; I P Bissett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Diagnosis of anal sphincter defects by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound in women with anal incontinence.

Authors:  Kumi Hotta; Ryoko Murayama; Mikako Yoshida; Hironobu Hyodo; Koichi Kobayashi; Megumi Haruna; Masayo Matsuzaki; Shiro Kozuma; Sachiyo Murashima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Anal Sphincter Anatomy Prepregnancy to Postdelivery Among the Same Primiparous Women on Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Mark E Lockhart; Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus Cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Rebecca J Hall; Lawrence M Leeman; Laura Migliaccio; Clifford Qualls; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The immediate effect of vaginal and caesarean delivery on anal sphincter measurements.

Authors:  Deniz Karcaaltincaba; Salim Erkaya; Hatice Isik; Ali Haberal
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Dieter Nuernberg; Adrian Saftoiu; Ana Paula Barreiros; Eike Burmester; Elena Tatiana Ivan; Dirk-André Clevert; Christoph F Dietrich; Odd Helge Gilja; Torben Lorentzen; Giovanni Maconi; Ismail Mihmanli; Christian Pallson Nolsoe; Frank Pfeffer; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Zeno Sparchez; Peter Vilmann; Jo Erling Riise Waage
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2019-02-05

9.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for detecting, visualizing and monitoring the healing process.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Stickelmann; Lieven Nils Kennes; Miriam Hölscher; Charlotte Graef; Tomas Kupec; Julia Wittenborn; Elmar Stickeler; Laila Najjari
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 10.  Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects.

Authors:  Ginevra Salsi; Ilaria Cataneo; Gaia Dodaro; Nicola Rizzo; Gianluigi Pilu; Mar Sanz Gascón; Aly Youssef
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.