RATIONALE: There is evidence that lesions of the nucleus accumbens core (AcbC) promote preference for smaller earlier reinforcers over larger delayed reinforcers in inter-temporal choice paradigms. It is not known whether this reflects an effect of the lesion on the rate of delay discounting, on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude, or both. AIM: We examined the effect of AcbC lesions on inter-temporal choice using a quantitative method that allows effects on delay discounting to be distinguished from effects on sensitivity to reinforcer size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen rats received bilateral quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the AcbC; 14 received sham lesions. They were trained under a discrete-trials progressive delay schedule to press two levers (A and B) for a sucrose solution. Responses on A delivered 50 microl of the solution after a delay d(A); responses on B delivered 100 microl after d(B). d(B) increased across blocks of trials, while d(A) was manipulated across phases of the experiment. Indifference delay d(B(50)) (value of d(B) corresponding to 50% choice of B) was estimated in each phase, and linear indifference functions (d(B(50)) vs d(A)) derived. RESULTS: d(B(50)) increased linearly with d(A) (r(2) > 0.95 in each group). The intercept of the indifference function was lower in the lesioned than the sham-lesioned group; slope did not differ between groups. The lesioned rats had extensive neuronal loss in the AcbC. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that lesions of the AcbC promote preference for smaller, earlier reinforcers and suggest that this reflects an effect of the lesion on the rate of delay discounting.
RATIONALE: There is evidence that lesions of the nucleus accumbens core (AcbC) promote preference for smaller earlier reinforcers over larger delayed reinforcers in inter-temporal choice paradigms. It is not known whether this reflects an effect of the lesion on the rate of delay discounting, on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude, or both. AIM: We examined the effect of AcbC lesions on inter-temporal choice using a quantitative method that allows effects on delay discounting to be distinguished from effects on sensitivity to reinforcer size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen rats received bilateral quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the AcbC; 14 received sham lesions. They were trained under a discrete-trials progressive delay schedule to press two levers (A and B) for a sucrose solution. Responses on A delivered 50 microl of the solution after a delay d(A); responses on B delivered 100 microl after d(B). d(B) increased across blocks of trials, while d(A) was manipulated across phases of the experiment. Indifference delay d(B(50)) (value of d(B) corresponding to 50% choice of B) was estimated in each phase, and linear indifference functions (d(B(50)) vs d(A)) derived. RESULTS: d(B(50)) increased linearly with d(A) (r(2) > 0.95 in each group). The intercept of the indifference function was lower in the lesioned than the sham-lesioned group; slope did not differ between groups. The lesioned rats had extensive neuronal loss in the AcbC. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that lesions of the AcbC promote preference for smaller, earlier reinforcers and suggest that this reflects an effect of the lesion on the rate of delay discounting.
Authors: S Mobini; S Body; M-Y Ho; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2002-01-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Justin R Yates; Mahesh Darna; Cassandra D Gipson; Linda P Dwoskin; Michael T Bardo Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi Journal: J Exp Anal Behav Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.468
Authors: Kathryn M Rothenhoefer; Vincent D Costa; Ramón Bartolo; Raquel Vicario-Feliciano; Elisabeth A Murray; Bruno B Averbeck Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: S da Costa Araújo; S Body; L Valencia Torres; C M Olarte Sanchez; V K Bak; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2010-05-16 Impact factor: 3.332