Literature DB >> 17659238

Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features.

Wei-Chih Shen1, Ruey-Feng Chang, Woo Kyung Moon, Yi-Hong Chou, Chiun-Sheng Huang.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Based on the definitions in mass category of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System developed by American College of Radiology, eight computerized features including shape, orientation, margin, lesion boundary, echo pattern, and posterior acoustic feature classes are proposed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our experimental database consists of 265 pathology-proven cases including 180 benign and 85 malignant masses. The capacity of each proposed feature in differentiating malignant from benign masses was validated by Student's t test and the correlation between each proposed feature and the pathological result was evaluated by point biserial coefficient. Binary logistic regression model was used to relate all proposed features and pathological result as a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. The diagnostic value of each proposed feature in the CAD system was further evaluated by the feature selection methods. Additionally, the likelihood of malignancy for each individual feature was also estimated by binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: On each proposed feature, the malignant cases were significantly different from the benign ones. The correlation between the angular characteristic and pathological result was indicated as very high. Three substantial correlations appear in features irregular shape, undulation characteristic, and degree of abrupt interface, but the relationship for orientation feature is low. For the constructed CAD system, the performance indices accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 91.70% (243 of 265), 90.59% (77 of 85), 92.22% (166 of 180), 84.62% (77 of 91), and 95.40% (166 of 174), respectively, and the area index in the ROC analysis was 0.97. Compared with the significant contribution of angular characteristic, the diagnostic values of posterior acoustic feature and orientation feature were relatively low for the CAD system. When three or more angular characteristics are discovered or the degree of abrupt interface is lower than 18, the likelihood of malignancy could be predicted as greater than 40%.
CONCLUSION: The computerized BI-RADS sonographic features conform to the sign of malignancy in the clinical experience and efficiently help the CAD system to diagnose the mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17659238     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  22 in total

1.  Novel computer-aided diagnosis algorithms on ultrasound image: effects on solid breast masses discrimination.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Hong Wang; Yanhui Guo; Chunping Ning; Bo Liu; H D Cheng; Jiawei Tian
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Classification of breast masses in ultrasound images using self-adaptive differential evolution extreme learning machine and rough set feature selection.

Authors:  Kadayanallur Mahadevan Prabusankarlal; Palanisamy Thirumoorthy; Radhakrishnan Manavalan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-16

3.  Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Diagnosis of solid breast tumors using vessel analysis in three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images.

Authors:  Yan-Hao Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Woo Kyung Moon; Wen-Jia Kuo; Kuan-Ju Lai; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Computer-aided diagnostic models in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Turgay Ayer; Mehmet Us Ayvaci; Ze Xiu Liu; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2010-06-01

Review 6.  AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Authors:  Almir Bitencourt; Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.531

7.  Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chintana Paramagul; Janet E Bailey; Alexis V Nees; Caroline E Blane; Dorit D Adler; Stephanie K Patterson; Katherine A Klein; Renee W Pinsky; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Computer-aided assessment of tumor grade for breast cancer in ultrasound images.

Authors:  Dar-Ren Chen; Cheng-Liang Chien; Yan-Fu Kuo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Observer Variability in BI-RADS Ultrasound Features and Its Influence on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Masses.

Authors:  Laith R Sultan; Ghizlane Bouzghar; Benjamin J Levenback; Nauroze A Faizi; Santosh S Venkatesh; Emily F Conant; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Adv Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-09

10.  Diagnostic assessment by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance in differentiation of breast lesions under different imaging protocols.

Authors:  Hongmin Cai; Lizhi Liu; Yanxia Peng; Yaopan Wu; Li Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.