Literature DB >> 19902300

Novel computer-aided diagnosis algorithms on ultrasound image: effects on solid breast masses discrimination.

Ying Wang1, Hong Wang, Yanhui Guo, Chunping Ning, Bo Liu, H D Cheng, Jiawei Tian.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to retrospectively investigate whether using the newly developed algorithms would improve radiologists' accuracy for discriminating malignant masses from benign ones on ultrasonographic (US) images. Five radiologists blinded to the histological results and clinical history independently interpreted 226 cases according to the sonographic lexicon of the fourth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and assigned a final assessment category to indicate the probability of malignancy. For each case, each radiologist provided three diagnoses: first with the original images, subsequently with the assistant of the resulting images processed by the proposed CAD algorithms which are called as processed images, and another using the processed images only. Observers' malignancy rating data were analyzed with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For reading only with the processed images, areas under the ROC curve (A(z)) of each reader (0.863, 0.867, 0.859, 0.868, 0.878) were better than that with the original images (0.772, 0.807, 0.796, 0.828, 0.846), difference of the average A(z) between the twice reading was significant (p < 0.001). Compared with the results single used processed images, A(z) of utilizing the combined images were increased (0.866, 0.885, 0.872, 0.894, 0.903), but the difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.081). The proposed CAD method has potential to be a good aid to radiologists in distinguishing malignant breast solid masses from benign ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902300      PMCID: PMC3046684          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9245-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  20 in total

1.  Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Chung-Ming Chen; Yi-Hong Chou; Ko-Chung Han; Guo-Shian Hung; Chui-Mei Tiu; Hong-Jen Chiou; See-Ying Chiou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Authors:  Andrea S Hong; Eric L Rosen; Mary S Soo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Chintana Paramagul; Janet Bailey; Alexis V Nees; Caroline Blane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  M Costantini; P Belli; C Ierardi; G Franceschini; G La Torre; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images.

Authors:  C M Wu; Y C Chen; K S Hsieh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  A novel approach to speckle reduction in ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Yanhui Guo; H D Cheng; Jiawei Tian; Yingtao Zhang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Magnus A McGee; Maureen G C Gillan; Caroline R M Boggis; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computer-based margin analysis of breast sonography for differentiating malignant and benign masses.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Theodore W Cary; Sarah A Kangas; Susan P Weinstein; Susan M Schultz; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Carl J D'Orsi; Valerie P Jackson; Lawrence W Bassett; Craig A Beam; Rebecca S Lewis; Philip E Crewson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  The usefulness of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for improving the performance of clinicians to diagnose non-mass lesions on breast ultrasonographic images.

Authors:  Mai Shibusawa; Ryohei Nakayama; Yuko Okanami; Yumi Kashikura; Nao Imai; Takashi Nakamura; Hiroko Kimura; Masako Yamashita; Noriko Hanamura; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  COVID-19 Detection Through Transfer Learning Using Multimodal Imaging Data.

Authors:  Michael J Horry; Subrata Chakraborty; Manoranjan Paul; Anwaar Ulhaq; Biswajeet Pradhan; Manas Saha; Nagesh Shukla
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Application of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound interpretation: improvements in diagnostic performance according to reader experience.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Choi; Bong Joo Kang; Ji Eun Baek; Hyun Sil Lee; Sung Hun Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-08-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.