BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To evaluate the reasons for the occurrence of invasive cervical cancer in Carinthia despite cytological screening, all 132 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the years 2000-2002 were recorded and all gynecological cytological smears made within the 5 years prior to the diagnosis of cancer were reevaluated. RESULTS: Within the 5 years prior to diagnosis, no gynaecological cytological smear was found for 50% of the patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the years 2000-2002. In the year 2002, a total of 53 patients were reported to have cervical cancer and 78 smears were reevaluated. Of all the smears primarily diagnosed as negative, 49% were found to be positive (> or =Pap III) after reevaluation and 92% of all smears "correctly" diagnosed as negative showed quality deficiencies. The interobserver variability (kappa-statistics) showed a moderate value when the primary screening results were compared with the reevaluation. The interobserver variability within the group of reevaluators was also moderate.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To evaluate the reasons for the occurrence of invasive cervical cancer in Carinthia despite cytological screening, all 132 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the years 2000-2002 were recorded and all gynecological cytological smears made within the 5 years prior to the diagnosis of cancer were reevaluated. RESULTS: Within the 5 years prior to diagnosis, no gynaecological cytological smear was found for 50% of the patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the years 2000-2002. In the year 2002, a total of 53 patients were reported to have cervical cancer and 78 smears were reevaluated. Of all the smears primarily diagnosed as negative, 49% were found to be positive (> or =Pap III) after reevaluation and 92% of all smears "correctly" diagnosed as negative showed quality deficiencies. The interobserver variability (kappa-statistics) showed a moderate value when the primary screening results were compared with the reevaluation. The interobserver variability within the group of reevaluators was also moderate.
Authors: Éva Rásky; Peter Regitnig; Michél Schenouda; Nathalie Burkert; Wolfgang Freidl Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 3.295