Literature DB >> 17653718

[Reevaluation of cytological smears in patients with cervical cancer. Regional quality assurance program with the cooperation of the Austrian Society for Cytology, the Carinthian Medical Association and the Carinthian Ministry of Health].

P Regitnig1, H P Dinges, E Ropp, H Fladerer, F Moinfar, G Breitenecker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: To evaluate the reasons for the occurrence of invasive cervical cancer in Carinthia despite cytological screening, all 132 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the years 2000-2002 were recorded and all gynecological cytological smears made within the 5 years prior to the diagnosis of cancer were reevaluated.
RESULTS: Within the 5 years prior to diagnosis, no gynaecological cytological smear was found for 50% of the patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in the years 2000-2002. In the year 2002, a total of 53 patients were reported to have cervical cancer and 78 smears were reevaluated. Of all the smears primarily diagnosed as negative, 49% were found to be positive (> or =Pap III) after reevaluation and 92% of all smears "correctly" diagnosed as negative showed quality deficiencies. The interobserver variability (kappa-statistics) showed a moderate value when the primary screening results were compared with the reevaluation. The interobserver variability within the group of reevaluators was also moderate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17653718     DOI: 10.1007/s00292-007-0931-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathologe        ISSN: 0172-8113            Impact factor:   1.011


  18 in total

1.  Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting, and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. Second edition including revised performance indicators.

Authors:  E J Johnson; J Patnick
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.073

2.  Poor correlation of high-grade cervical dysplasia with referral cytology: clinical implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prim Care Update Ob Gyns       Date:  1998-07-01

3.  Cytopathology in Austria.

Authors:  G Breitenecker; H P Dinges; P Regitnig; H Wiener; Ch Vutuc
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  G B Kristensen; K D Skyggebjerg; B Hølund; K Holm; M K Hansen
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.319

5.  Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.

Authors:  H Y Sung; K A Kearney; M Miller; W Kinney; G F Sawaya; R A Hiatt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  [Cytological history of 148 women presenting with invasive cervical cancer].

Authors:  N Mubiayi; E Bogaert; F Boman; E Leblanc; D Vinatier; J L Leroy; D Querleu
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2002-03

7.  Cancer diagnosis after a report of negative cervical cytology.

Authors:  H S Mitchell; G G Giles
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1996-03-04       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?

Authors:  M E Sherman; D Kelly
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Audit of deaths from cervical cancer: proposal for an essential component of the National Screening Programme.

Authors:  D N Slater; P C Milner; H Radley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A retrospective analysis of 94 patients with CIN and false negative cervical smears taken at colposcopy.

Authors:  A R Beeby; V Wadehra; P J Keating; T I Wagstaff
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.073

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].

Authors:  P Regitnig; A Nader; H Wiener
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  [Cervical cancer in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. Tumor stage, histological tumor type, age and screening participation of 985 patients].

Authors:  K Marquardt; M Stubbe; U Broschewitz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Quality of screening with conventional Pap smear in Austria - a longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  Éva Rásky; Peter Regitnig; Michél Schenouda; Nathalie Burkert; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Markus Fabrizii; Farid Moinfar; Herbert F Jelinek; Audrey Karperien; Helmut Ahammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.