Literature DB >> 11998209

[Cytological history of 148 women presenting with invasive cervical cancer].

N Mubiayi1, E Bogaert, F Boman, E Leblanc, D Vinatier, J L Leroy, D Querleu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the cytological history of women presenting with invasive cervical cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 148 patients treated for invasive cervical cancer in three hospitals of the North Pas de Calais in France.
RESULTS: The average age of patients was 49 (26-86). Squamous carcinomas represented 81% of cases (120/148), adenocarcinomas 17% (25/148) and adenosquamous carcinomas 2% (3/148). 36.5% of patients (54/148) had never had a Pap smear. 34.5% (51/148) had had an occasional Pap smear (the last one dated of more than three years). 8.1% (12/148) were lost for follow up after a positive Pap smear. 3.4% (5/148) were treated for cervical dysplasia less than three years before the diagnosis of the cervical cancer. 17.5% (26/148) had had a Pap smear reported as negative less than three years before the diagnosis of the cervical cancer. In this last group, squamous carcinomas represented 57.7% of cases (15/26), adenocarcinomas 38.5% (10/26) and adenosquamous carcinomas 3.8% (1/26). 18 Pap smears of 26 reported as negative less than three years before the diagnosis of the cancer were reviewed. These Pap smears came from 11 patients presenting with squamous carcinoma and seven other presenting with adenocarcinoma. After review, 15 Pap smears were reported as false negatives and two as true negatives. The review was not possible in one case.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the failures of cervical cancer screening were essentially attributed to the lack or the insufficiency of screening and the existence of false negatives of the cytology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11998209     DOI: 10.1016/s1297-9589(02)00297-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil        ISSN: 1297-9589


  4 in total

1.  Trends Over Time in Pap and Pap-HPV Cotesting for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Robert M Jacobson; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; Jennifer L St Sauver; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  [Reevaluation of cytological smears in patients with cervical cancer. Regional quality assurance program with the cooperation of the Austrian Society for Cytology, the Carinthian Medical Association and the Carinthian Ministry of Health].

Authors:  P Regitnig; H P Dinges; E Ropp; H Fladerer; F Moinfar; G Breitenecker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Impact of Patient Reminders on Papanicolaou Test Completion for High-Risk Patients Identified by a Clinical Decision Support System.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Maya E Kessler; Ravikumar Komandur Elayavilli; Branden C Hickey; Marianne R Scheitel; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu; Walter K Kremers; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Poor Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance and False Negatives. A Call for Organized Screening.

Authors:  Marta Castillo; Aurora Astudillo; Omar Clavero; Julio Velasco; Raquel Ibáñez; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.