Literature DB >> 17652468

Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Christian C Ruff1, Sven Bestmann, Felix Blankenburg, Otto Bjoertomt, Oliver Josephs, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Ralf Deichmann, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

It has often been proposed that regions of the human parietal and/or frontal lobe may modulate activity in visual cortex, for example, during selective attention or saccade preparation. However, direct evidence for such causal claims is largely missing in human studies, and it remains unclear to what degree the putative roles of parietal and frontal regions in modulating visual cortex may differ. Here we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) concurrently, to show that stimulating right human intraparietal sulcus (IPS, at a site previously implicated in attention) elicits a pattern of activity changes in visual cortex that strongly depends on current visual context. Increased intensity of IPS TMS affected the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in V5/MT+ only when moving stimuli were present to drive this visual region, whereas TMS-elicited BOLD signal changes were observed in areas V1-V4 only during the absence of visual input. These influences of IPS TMS upon remote visual cortex differed significantly from corresponding effects of frontal (eye field) TMS, in terms of how they related to current visual input and their spatial topography for retinotopic areas V1-V4. Our results show directly that parietal and frontal regions can indeed have distinct patterns of causal influence upon functional activity in human visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17652468      PMCID: PMC2601025          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  69 in total

Review 1.  Towards a network theory of cognition.

Authors:  A R McIntosh
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov

2.  Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series.

Authors:  J L Andersson; C Hutton; J Ashburner; R Turner; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visualization and measurement of the cortical surface.

Authors:  B A Wandell; S Chial; B T Backus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effect of spatial and temporal information on saccades and neural activity in oculomotor structures.

Authors:  D Gagnon; G A O'Driscoll; M Petrides; G B Pike
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory.

Authors:  K J Friston; W Penny; C Phillips; S Kiebel; G Hinton; J Ashburner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion.

Authors:  L Battelli; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator; M J Tramo; M A Hénaff; F Michèl; J J Barton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex.

Authors:  C C Hilgetag; H Théoret; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Neurobiological measures of human selective attention.

Authors:  J Driver; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys.

Authors:  F Bremmer; A Schlack; N J Shah; O Zafiris; M Kubischik; K Hoffmann; K Zilles; G R Fink
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  132 in total

Review 1.  The role of neuromodulators in selective attention.

Authors:  Behrad Noudoost; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the brain's intrinsic activity in a frequency-dependent manner.

Authors:  Mark C Eldaief; Mark A Halko; Randy L Buckner; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks.

Authors:  Nicholas E DiQuattro; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Klaartje Heinen; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Christian Ruff; Jon Driver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dynamic activation of frontal, parietal, and sensory regions underlying anticipatory visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Gregory V Simpson; Darren L Weber; Corby L Dale; Dimitrios Pantazis; Steven L Bressler; Richard M Leahy; Tracy L Luks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  The amygdala response to images with impact.

Authors:  Michael P Ewbank; Philip J Barnard; Camilla J Croucher; Cristina Ramponi; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Steven L Bressler; Wei Tang; Chad M Sylvester; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.