Literature DB >> 17651007

How the camel lost its hump: the impact of object typicality on event-related potential signals in object decision.

O Hauk1, K Patterson, A Woollams, E Cooper-Pye, F Pulvermüller, T T Rogers.   

Abstract

Using an object decision task, event-related potentials (ERPs), and minimum norm current source estimates, we investigated early spatiotemporal aspects of cortical activation elicited by line drawings that were manipulated on two dimensions: authenticity and typicality. Authentic objects were those that match real-world experience, whereas nonauthentic objects were "doctored" by deletion or addition of features (e.g., a camel with its hump removed, a hammer with two handles). The main manipulation of interest for both authentic and nonauthentic objects was the degree of typicality in the object's structure: typical items are composed of parts that have tended to co-occur across many different objects in the perceiver's experience. The ERP pattern revealed a significant typicality effect at 116 msec after stimulus onset. Both atypical authentic objects (e.g., a camel with its hump) and atypical nonauthentic objects (e.g., a jackal with a hump) elicited stronger brain activation than did objects with typical structure. A significant effect of authenticity was observed at 480 msec, with stronger activation for the nonauthentic objects. The factors of typicality and authenticity interacted at 160 and 330 msec. The most prominent source of the typicality effect was the bilateral occipitotemporal cortex, whereas the interaction and the authenticity effects were mainly observed in the more anterior bilateral temporal cortex. These findings support the hypothesis that within the first few hundred milliseconds after stimulus presentation onset, visual-form-related perceptual and conceptual processes represent distinct but interacting stages in object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17651007     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  What's in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Twila Tardif; Xiaoqin Mai; William J Gehring; Nina Simms; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Clinical diagnostic criteria and classification controversies in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04

4.  Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Phillip J Holcomb; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 5.  The reign of typicality in semantic memory.

Authors:  Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Magnetoencephalography of frontotemporal dementia: spatiotemporally localized changes during semantic decisions.

Authors:  Laura E Hughes; Peter J Nestor; John R Hodges; James B Rowe
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Riding the lexical speedway: a critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-02

8.  Dynamic information processing states revealed through neurocognitive models of object semantics.

Authors:  Alex Clarke
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  The developmental pattern of stimulus and response interference in a color-object Stroop task: an ERP study.

Authors:  Ellen M M Jongen; Lisa M Jonkman
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 10.  The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology.

Authors:  O Hauk; Y Shtyrov; F Pulvermüller
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.