Literature DB >> 18716819

A comparison of sexual and asexual replication strategies in a simplified model based on the yeast life cycle.

Emmanuel Tannenbaum1.   

Abstract

This paper develops simplified mathematical models describing the mutation-selection balance for the asexual and sexual replication pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or Baker's yeast. The simplified models are based on the single-fitness-peak approximation in quasispecies theory. We assume diploid genomes consisting of two chromosomes, and we assume that each chromosome is functional if and only if its base sequence is identical to some master sequence. The growth and replication of the yeast cells is modeled as a first-order process, with first-order growth rate constants that are determined by whether a given genome consists of zero, one, or two functional chromosomes. In the asexual pathway, we assume that a given diploid cell divides into two diploids. For the sake of generality, our model allows for mitotic recombination and asymmetric chromosome segregation. In the sexual pathway, we assume that a given diploid cell divides into two diploids, each of which then divide into two haploids. The resulting four haploids enter a haploid pool, where they grow and replicate until they meet another haploid with which to fuse. In the sexual pathway, we consider two mating strategies: (1) a selective strategy, where only haploids with functional chromosomes can fuse with one another; (2) a random strategy, where haploids randomly fuse with one another. When the cost for sex is low, we find that the selective mating strategy leads to the highest mean fitness of the population, when compared to all of the other strategies. When the cost for sex is low, sexual replication with random mating also has a higher mean fitness than asexual replication without mitotic recombination or asymmetric chromosome segregation. We also show that, at low replication fidelities, sexual replication with random mating has a higher mean fitness than asexual replication, as long as the cost for sex is low. If the fitness penalty for having a defective chromosome is sufficiently high and the cost for sex sufficiently low, then at low replication fidelities the random mating strategy has a mean fitness that is a factor of square root 2 larger than the asexual mean fitness. We argue that for yeast, the selective mating strategy is the one that is closer to reality, which if true suggests that sex may provide a selective advantage under considerably more relaxed conditions than previous research has indicated. The results of this paper also suggest that S. cerevisiae switches from asexual to sexual replication when stressed, because stressful growth conditions provide an opportunity for the yeast to clear out deleterious mutations from their genomes. That being said, our model does not contradict theories for the evolution of sex that argue that sex evolved because it allows a population to more easily adapt to changing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716819     DOI: 10.1007/s12064-008-0049-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theory Biosci        ISSN: 1431-7613            Impact factor:   1.919


  19 in total

1.  THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations.

Authors:  Matthew R Goddard; H Charles J Godfray; Austin Burt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Selective advantage for sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-06-30

4.  Asexual and sexual replication in sporulating organisms.

Authors:  Bohyun Lee; Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-08-08

5.  Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex.

Authors:  L D Hurst; J R Peck
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Life cycle of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  I Herskowitz
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-12

Review 7.  Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex.

Authors:  H Bernstein; H C Byerly; F A Hopf; R E Michod
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations.

Authors:  C Zeyl; G Bell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Sex and the single cell: meiosis in yeast.

Authors:  G S Roeder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Initiation of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid meiosis.

Authors:  B De Massy; F Baudat; A Nicolas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  Selective advantage for sexual reproduction with random haploid fusion.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tannenbaum
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Standing genetic variation drives repeatable experimental evolution in outcrossing populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Molly K Burke; Gianni Liti; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Protein disorder reduced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to survive heat shock.

Authors:  Esmeralda Vicedo; Zofia Gasik; Yu-An Dong; Tatyana Goldberg; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-11-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.