Literature DB >> 17646490

Presenting research information to children: a tale of two methods.

Alan R Tait1, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Shobha Malviya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research information for children is often presented in a manner that is difficult to understand. We designed this study, therefore, to examine the effect of improved readability and processability of written study information on children's understanding.
METHODS: One-hundred-ninety children aged 7-17 yr who were hospitalized for a surgical procedure or medical treatment were randomized to receive study information using either a standard form or a modified form with improved readability and processability. Children were interviewed to determine their understanding of eight study elements, including the risks, benefits, protocol, etc., and their responses scored by two independent assessors.
RESULTS: Children who were randomized to the modified form had significantly greater overall understanding of the information and greater understanding of the protocol and benefits (P < 0.05). The modified form was particularly effective in improving younger children's (7-10 yr) understanding of the material. Multivariate analysis identified several predictors of understanding, including the modified format, age, reading ability and the degree to which the child read the information. When shown both forms, 81.3% of children preferred the modified form stating that it was "friendlier" and "easier to read." The use of a larger font size and pictures were particularly popular.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that modification of study information to better fit the ages and meet the reading and cognitive abilities of children results in their improved understanding and acceptance of the material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646490     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000270326.44507.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  14 in total

1.  Novel approach to parental permission and child assent for research: improving comprehension.

Authors:  Theresa A O'Lonergan; Jeri E Forster-Harwood
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Frontline ethical issues in pediatric clinical research: ethical and regulatory aspects of seven current bottlenecks in pediatric clinical research.

Authors:  Wim Pinxten; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Using digital multimedia to improve parents' and children's understanding of clinical trials.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Robert Levine
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Adolescents' understanding of research concepts: a focus group study.

Authors:  Diane R Blake; Celeste A Lemay; Margaret H Kearney; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-06

5.  Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Maureen McGonegal; Robert Levine
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Stanley J Chetcuti; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Do Illustrations Improve Children's Comprehension of Assent Documents?

Authors:  Kim G Adcock; Shirley M Hogan; Okan U Elci; Keri L Mills
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-07

8.  Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Vijayan N Nair; Naveen N Narisetty; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Readability of the written study information in pediatric research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean-François Leforestier; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigain; Carole Giraud; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.

Authors:  April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.