Literature DB >> 22023912

Cortical regions recruited for complex active-learning strategies and action planning exhibit rapid reactivation during memory retrieval.

Joel L Voss1, Ashley Galvan, Brian D Gonsalves.   

Abstract

Memory retrieval can involve activity in the same sensory cortical regions involved in perception of the original event, and this neural "reactivation" has been suggested as an important mechanism of memory retrieval. However, it is still unclear if fragments of experience other than sensory information are retained and later reactivated during retrieval. For example, learning in non-laboratory settings generally involves active exploration of memoranda, thus requiring the generation of action plans for behavior and the use of strategies deployed to improve subsequent memory performance. Is information pertaining to action planning and strategic processing retained and reactivated during retrieval? To address this question, we compared ERP correlates of memory retrieval for objects that had been studied in an active manner involving action planning and strategic processing to those for objects that had been studied passively. Memory performance was superior for actively studied objects, and unique ERP retrieval correlates for these objects were identified when subjects remembered the specific spatial locations at which objects were studied. Early-onset frontal shifts in ERP correlates of retrieval were noted for these objects, which parallel the recruitment of frontal cortex during learning object locations previously identified using fMRI with the same paradigm. Notably, ERPs during recall for items studied with a specific viewing strategy localized to the same supplementary motor cortex region previously identified with fMRI when this strategy was implemented during study, suggesting rapid reactivation of regions directly involved in strategic action planning. Collectively, these results implicate neural populations involved in learning in important retrieval functions, even for those populations involved in strategic control and action planning. Notably, these episodic features are not generally reported during recollective experiences, suggesting that reactivation is a more general property of memory retrieval that extends beyond those fragments of perceptual information that might be needed to re-live the past.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22023912      PMCID: PMC3223278          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  47 in total

1.  Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions.

Authors:  L Nyberg; K M Petersson; L G Nilsson; J Sandblom; C Aberg; M Ingvar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of autobiographical memory: neural correlates of recall, emotional intensity, and reliving.

Authors:  Sander M Daselaar; Heather J Rice; Daniel L Greenberg; Roberto Cabeza; Kevin S LaBar; David C Rubin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Retrieving autobiographical memories of painful events activates the anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus.

Authors:  Sioban Kelly; Donna Lloyd; Turo Nurmikko; Neil Roberts
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 6.  Play it again: reactivation of waking experience and memory.

Authors:  Joseph O'Neill; Barty Pleydell-Bouverie; David Dupret; Jozsef Csicsvari
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Implicit expressions of memory in organic amnesia: learning of new facts and associations.

Authors:  D L Schacter
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1987

8.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Memory for pantomimed actions versus actions with real objects.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Spatial selectivity of rat hippocampal neurons: dependence on preparedness for movement.

Authors:  T C Foster; C A Castro; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Distinct Hippocampal versus Frontoparietal Network Contributions to Retrieval and Memory-guided Exploration.

Authors:  Donna J Bridge; Neal J Cohen; Joel L Voss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effect of choice on intentional and incidental memory.

Authors:  Zhuolei Ding; Ting Jiang; Chuansheng Chen; Vishnu P Murty; Jingming Xue; Mingxia Zhang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Active retrieval facilitates across-episode binding by modulating the content of memory.

Authors:  Donna J Bridge; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Deconstructing the effect of self-directed study on episodic memory.

Authors:  Douglas Markant; Sarah DuBrow; Lila Davachi; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

5.  Functional connectivity of the striatum in experts of stenography.

Authors:  Takehito Ito; Tetsuya Matsuda; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Binding among select episodic elements is altered via active short-term retrieval.

Authors:  Donna J Bridge; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Activation of stimulus-specific processing regions at retrieval tracks the strength of relational memory.

Authors:  Brion Woroch; Alex Konkel; Brian D Gonsalves
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  The hippocampus and exploration: dynamically evolving behavior and neural representations.

Authors:  Adam Johnson; Zachary Varberg; James Benhardus; Anthony Maahs; Paul Schrater
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Age-related impairments in active learning and strategic visual exploration.

Authors:  Kelly L Brandstatt; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.