BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 1-methylnicotinamide (MNA) has been considered to be an inactive metabolite of nicotinamide. Here we assessed the anti-thrombotic activity of MNA in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Antithrombotic action of MNA was studied in normotensive rats with extracorporeal thrombus formation (thrombolysis), in renovascular hypertensive rats with intraarterial thrombus formation (arterial thrombosis) and in a venous thrombosis model in rats (venous thrombosis). KEY RESULTS: MNA (3-100 mg kg(-1)) induced a dose-dependent and sustained thrombolytic response, associated with a rise in 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) in blood. Various compounds structurally related to MNA were either inactive or weaker thrombolytics. Rofecoxib (0.01-1 mg kg(-1)), dose-dependently inhibited the thrombolytic response of MNA, indomethacin (5 mg kg(-1)) abolished it, while L-NAME (5 mg kg(-1)) were without effect. MNA (3-30 mg kg(-1)) also reduced arterial thrombosis and this effect was abrogated by indomethacin (2.5 mg kg(-1)) as well as by rofecoxib (1 mg kg(-1)). MNA, however, did not affect venous thrombosis. In vitro MNA did not modify platelet aggregation nor induce vasodilation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: MNA displayed a profile of anti-thrombotic activity in vivo that surpasses that of closely related compounds. MNA inhibited platelet-dependent thrombosis by a mechanism involving cyclooxygenase-2 and prostacyclin. Our findings suggest that endogenous MNA, produced in the liver by nicotinamide N-methyltransferase, could be an endogenous activator of prostacyclin production and thus may regulate thrombotic as well as inflammatory processes in the cardiovascular system.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:1-methylnicotinamide (MNA) has been considered to be an inactive metabolite of nicotinamide. Here we assessed the anti-thrombotic activity of MNA in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Antithrombotic action of MNA was studied in normotensive rats with extracorporeal thrombus formation (thrombolysis), in renovascular hypertensiverats with intraarterial thrombus formation (arterial thrombosis) and in a venous thrombosis model in rats (venous thrombosis). KEY RESULTS:MNA (3-100 mg kg(-1)) induced a dose-dependent and sustained thrombolytic response, associated with a rise in 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) in blood. Various compounds structurally related to MNA were either inactive or weaker thrombolytics. Rofecoxib (0.01-1 mg kg(-1)), dose-dependently inhibited the thrombolytic response of MNA, indomethacin (5 mg kg(-1)) abolished it, while L-NAME (5 mg kg(-1)) were without effect. MNA (3-30 mg kg(-1)) also reduced arterial thrombosis and this effect was abrogated by indomethacin (2.5 mg kg(-1)) as well as by rofecoxib (1 mg kg(-1)). MNA, however, did not affect venous thrombosis. In vitro MNA did not modify platelet aggregation nor induce vasodilation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: MNA displayed a profile of anti-thrombotic activity in vivo that surpasses that of closely related compounds. MNA inhibited platelet-dependent thrombosis by a mechanism involving cyclooxygenase-2 and prostacyclin. Our findings suggest that endogenous MNA, produced in the liver by nicotinamide N-methyltransferase, could be an endogenous activator of prostacyclin production and thus may regulate thrombotic as well as inflammatory processes in the cardiovascular system.
Authors: R J Gryglewski; W Uracz; J Swies; S Chlopicki; E Marcinkiewicz; M Lomnicka; J Madej Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: K Aoyama; K Matsubara; K Okada; S Fukushima; K Shimizu; S Yamaguchi; T Uezono; M Satomi; N Hayase; S Ohta; H Shiono; S Kobayashi Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2000 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: M Wojewódzka-Zelezniakowicz; E Chabielska; A Mogielnicki; K Kramkowski; A Karp; A Opadczuk; T Domaniewski; M Malinowska-Zaprzałka; W Buczko Journal: J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.011
Authors: Jerzy Gebicki; Anna Sysa-Jedrzejowska; Jan Adamus; Anna Woźniacka; Małgorzata Rybak; Jacek Zielonka Journal: Pol J Pharmacol Date: 2003 Jan-Feb
Authors: James K Hennan; Ting-Ting Hong; David E Willens; Edward M Driscoll; Thierry A Giboulot; Benedict R Lucchesi Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Manuel U Ramirez; Elizabeth R Stirling; Nancy J Emenaker; David D Roberts; David R Soto-Pantoja Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Jerzy A Zoladz; Michał Śmigielski; Joanna Majerczak; Łukasz R Nowak; Justyna Zapart-Bukowska; Olgierd Smoleński; Jan Kulpa; Krzysztof Duda; Joanna Drzewińska; Grzegorz Bartosz Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Rafał Biedroń; Marta Ciszek; Marianna Tokarczyk; Małgorzata Bobek; Maria Kurnyta; Ewa M Słominska; Ryszard T Smoleński; Janusz Marcinkiewicz Journal: Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 4.291