Literature DB >> 12441637

Opposite responses in two DNA repair capacity tests in lymphocytes of head and neck cancer patients.

Maria Sasiadek1, Kamila Schlade-Bartusiak, Monika Zych, Leszek Noga, Halina Czemarmazowicz.   

Abstract

Genomic instability has long been recognized as the main feature of neoplasia and a factor modulating individual cancer susceptibility. There are attempts to find effective assays of both individual DNA repair capacity and genetic instability, and their relation to the cancer risk. Genetic predisposition plays an important role in the etiology and development of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of our study was to search for a correlation between chromosomal instability and DNA repair capacity in HNSCC patients and healthy controls. The chromosomal instability was measured by the number of bleomycin (BLM)-induced chromosomal aberrations and diepoxybutane (DEB)-induced sister chromatid exchanges. The DNA repair capacity was assessed using the DEB-induced adaptive response (AR). The HNSCC patients in our study showed a significant increase in chromosomal instability after a preterminal exposure of their lymphocytes to either BLM for the last 5 h or DEB for the last 24 h of incubation. However, the AR was higher in HNSCC patients than in the control group, suggesting an increase in the DNA repair capacity in the cancer patients as compared to the control. There is no correlation between the DNA repair capacity estimated on the basis of preterminal exposures to BLM and DEB and the DNA repair capacity estimated on the basis of the adaptive response to DEB. The preterminal exposure and the adaptive response test may activate different DNA repair mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12441637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

1.  DNA repair and mutagen sensitivity of epithelial cells and lymphocytes in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Reiter; Philipp Baumeister; Sonja Jaiser; Andreas Reiss; Sabina Schwenk-Zieger; Norbert Kleinsasser; Ulrich Harréus
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Does single-dose cell resistance to the radio-mimetic zeocin correlate with a zeocin-induced adaptive response in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains?

Authors:  E Dimova; M Dimitrova; D Miteva; Z Mitrovska; N P Yurina; P E Bryant; S Chankova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Induction of DNA double-strand breaks by zeocin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the role of increased DNA double-strand breaks rejoining in the formation of an adaptive response.

Authors:  S G Chankova; E Dimova; M Dimitrova; P E Bryant
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Ionizing radiation-induced adaptive response in fibroblasts under both monolayer and 3-dimensional conditions.

Authors:  Yinlong Zhao; Rui Zhong; Liguang Sun; Jie Jia; Shumei Ma; Xiaodong Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.