OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reliability of applying the WHO Cardiovascular Risk Management Package by non-physician health-care workers (NPHWs) in typical primary health-care settings. METHODS: Based on an a priori 80% agreement level between the NPHWs and the "expert" physicians (gold standard), 649 paired (matched) applications of the protocol were obtained for analysis using Kappa statistic and multivariate logit regression. FINDINGS: Results indicate over 80% agreement between raters, from moderate to perfect levels of agreement in almost all of the sections in the package. The odds of obtaining a difference between raters and a benchmark are not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Applying the WHO Cardiovascular Risk Management Package, NPHWs can be retrained to reliably and effectively assess and manage cardiovascular risks in primary health-care settings where there are no attending physicians. The package could be a useful tool for scaling up the management of cardiovascular diseases in primary health care.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the reliability of applying the WHO Cardiovascular Risk Management Package by non-physician health-care workers (NPHWs) in typical primary health-care settings. METHODS: Based on an a priori 80% agreement level between the NPHWs and the "expert" physicians (gold standard), 649 paired (matched) applications of the protocol were obtained for analysis using Kappa statistic and multivariate logit regression. FINDINGS: Results indicate over 80% agreement between raters, from moderate to perfect levels of agreement in almost all of the sections in the package. The odds of obtaining a difference between raters and a benchmark are not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Applying the WHO Cardiovascular Risk Management Package, NPHWs can be retrained to reliably and effectively assess and manage cardiovascular risks in primary health-care settings where there are no attending physicians. The package could be a useful tool for scaling up the management of cardiovascular diseases in primary health care.
Authors: Peter M Brindle; Alex McConnachie; Mark N Upton; Carole L Hart; George Davey Smith; Graham C M Watt Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jeffrey W Stephens; Gareth Ambler; Patrick Vallance; D John Betteridge; Steve E Humphries; Steven J Hurel Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil Date: 2004-12
Authors: Alessandro Menotti; Mariapaola Lanti; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Luigi Carratelli; Giovanni Cavera; Ada Dormi; Antonio Gaddi; Mario Mancini; Mario Motolese; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Sandro Muntoni; Sergio Muntoni; Alberto Notarbartolo; Pierluigi Prati; Stefano Remiddi; Alberto Zanchetti Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: R Marchioli; F Avanzini; F Barzi; C Chieffo; A Di Castelnuovo; M G Franzosi; E Geraci; A P Maggioni; R M Marfisi; N Mininni; G L Nicolosi; M Santini; C Schweiger; L Tavazzi; G Tognoni; F Valagussa Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Stella Aslibekyan; Hannia Campos; Eric B Loucks; Crystal D Linkletter; Jose M Ordovas; Ana Baylin Journal: J Nutr Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Alexander Bischoff; Tetanye Ekoe; Nicolas Perone; Slim Slama; Louis Loutan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joseph Linju Maria; T N Anand; Boban Dona; Jose Prinu; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Panniyammakal Jeemon Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 26.763