Literature DB >> 16314229

Riskard 2005. New tools for prediction of cardiovascular disease risk derived from Italian population studies.

Alessandro Menotti1, Mariapaola Lanti, Enrico Agabiti-Rosei, Luigi Carratelli, Giovanni Cavera, Ada Dormi, Antonio Gaddi, Mario Mancini, Mario Motolese, Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Sandro Muntoni, Sergio Muntoni, Alberto Notarbartolo, Pierluigi Prati, Stefano Remiddi, Alberto Zanchetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The need to update tools for the estimate of cardiovascular risk prompted the "Gruppo di Ricerca per la Stima del Rischio Cardiovascolare in Italia" to produce a new chart and new software called Riskard 2005. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data from 9 population studies in 8 Italian regions, for a grand total of 17,153 subjects (12,045 men and 5,108 women) aged 35-74 and for a total exposure of about 194,000 person/years were available. A chart for the estimate of cardiovascular risk (major coronary, cerebrovascular and peripheral artery disease events) in 10 years was produced for men and women aged 45-74 free from cardiovascular diseases. Risk factors employed in the estimate were sex, age (6 classes), systolic blood pressure (4 classes), serum cholesterol (5 classes), diabetes, and cigarette smoking (4 classes). Estimates were produced for absolute risk and for relative risk, the latter against levels expected in the general population that produced the risk functions. Software was produced for the separate estimate of major coronary, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (the latter made by coronary, cerebrovascular and peripheral artery disease of atherosclerotic origin) for follow-up at 5, 10 or 15 years, in men a women aged 35-74 years at entry and free from cardiovascular diseases. Risk factors employed here were sex, age, body mass index, mean physiological blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, cigarette smoking, diabetes and heart rate. The output is based on several indicators: absolute risk, relative risk (as defined above), ideal risk (for a very favourable risk profile), biological age of risk, comparisons among the above indicators, the percent contribution of risk factors to the excess of estimated risk above the level of the ideal risk, and the description of trends in risk estimate in relation to repeated measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: These tools represent progress compared to similar tools produced some years ago by the same Research Group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16314229     DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 0939-4753            Impact factor:   4.222


  12 in total

1.  Inclusion of stroke as an outcome and risk equivalent in risk scores for primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease.

Authors:  Mandip S Dhamoon; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Can non-physician health-care workers assess and manage cardiovascular risk in primary care?

Authors:  Dele O Abegunde; Bakuti Shengelia; Anne Luyten; Alexandra Cameron; Francesca Celletti; Sania Nishtar; Vasu Pandurangi; Shanthi Mendis
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  A systematic review of the status and methodological considerations for estimating risk of first ever stroke in the general population.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Jiuyi Huang; Qingsong Yu; Hongfan Yu; Yang Pu; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Psychosocial factors and metabolic parameters: is there any association in elderly people? The Massa Lombarda Project.

Authors:  Marilisa Bove; Lucio Carnevali; Arrigo F G Cicero; Elisa Grandi; Morena Gaddoni; Giorgio Noera; Antonio V Gaddi
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.658

5.  Common genetic variants on chromosome 9p21 are associated with myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes in an Italian population.

Authors:  Francesca Gori; Claudia Specchia; Silvia Pietri; Luisa Crociati; Simona Barlera; Monica Franciosi; Antonio Nicolucci; Stefano Signorini; Paolo Brambilla; Maria Grazia Franzosi
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.103

6.  Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score: Results from the Filipino-American Women Cardiovascular Study.

Authors:  Irma B Ancheta; Cynthia A Battie; Annabelle S Volgman; Christine V Ancheta; Latha Palaniappan
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-12-23

7.  Predicting the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease: the framingham heart study.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Martin G Larson; Joseph M Massaro; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Population health needs assessment and healthcare services use in a 3 years follow-up on administrative and clinical data: results from the Brisighella Heart Study.

Authors:  Arrigo F G Cicero; Martina Rosticci; Sergio D'Addato; Cristina Baronio; Giulia Grossi; Elisa Grandi; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-11-16

9.  Framingham risk prediction equations for incidence of cardiovascular disease using detailed measures for smoking.

Authors:  Haider Mannan; Chris Stevenson; Anna Peeters; Helen Walls; John McNeil
Journal:  Heart Int       Date:  2010-12-31

10.  The clinical performance of an office-based risk scoring system for fatal cardiovascular diseases in North-East of Iran.

Authors:  Sadaf G Sepanlou; Reza Malekzadeh; Hossein Poustchi; Maryam Sharafkhah; Saeed Ghodsi; Fatemeh Malekzadeh; Arash Etemadi; Akram Pourshams; Paul D Pharoah; Christian C Abnet; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta; Sanford M Dawsey; Farin Kamangar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.