Literature DB >> 17639098

Coronary artery overexpansion increases neointimal hyperplasia after stent placement in a porcine model.

Robert J Russo1, Patricia D Silva, Mark Yeager.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an aggressive approach to coronary revascularisation with oversized balloons is counterproductive, we studied the effect of increasing balloon-to-artery (B:A) ratio on neointimal hyperplasia following primary stent placement using a non-atherosclerotic porcine coronary overstretch model.
METHODS: 60 vessels in 33 Yorkshire swine were randomly assigned to one of five B:A ratios between 1.0:1 and 1.4:1. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was performed before bare-metal stent placement to accurately determine vessel size, after stent placement, and at 28 days.
RESULTS: The mean prestent vessel diameter was 3.05 (0.31) (SD) mm. In-stent neointimal volume, in-stent volume stenosis and cross-sectional area stenosis at the stent minimum lumen diameter increased significantly with increasing achieved B:A ratio (multilevel regression test for slope, p<0.001, p = 0.002 and p<0.001, respectively) and were independent of vessel size. Even minor vessel overstretch at an achieved B:A ratio of 1.1:1 resulted in significant neointimal hyperplasia. Larger B:A ratios were also associated with more neointima beyond the stent edges (p = 0.008). For vessels from the same animal, neointimal response at a given B:A ratio was dependent upon the animal treated.
CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of IVUS-guided coronary primary stent placement, vessel overexpansion is counterproductive. Neointimal hyperplasia at 28 days is strongly associated with increasing B:A ratio. In addition, vessels do not respond independently of each other when multiple stents are placed within the same animal using a range of B:A ratios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17639098      PMCID: PMC2095733          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.105981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  21 in total

1.  Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study.

Authors:  P J Fitzgerald; A Oshima; M Hayase; J A Metz; S R Bailey; D S Baim; M W Cleman; E Deutsch; D J Diver; M B Leon; J W Moses; S N Oesterle; P A Overlie; C J Pepine; R D Safian; J Shani; C A Simonton; R W Smalling; P S Teirstein; J P Zidar; A C Yeung; R E Kuntz; P G Yock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  The porcine coronary model of in-stent restenosis: current status in the era of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Harry C Lowe; Robert S Schwartz; Briain D Mac Neill; Ik-Kyung Jang; Motoya Hayase; Campbell Rogers; Stephen N Oesterle
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound-guided histological measurements after stenting in porcine coronary artery.

Authors:  Christoph Strehblow; Mariann Gyöngyösi; Wolfgang Sperker; Maryam Shirazi; Ursula Windberger; Thea Pugatsch; Shmuel Ben-Sasson; Chaim Lotan; Dietmar Glogar
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.439

4.  Overestimation of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography (compared with intravascular ultrasound) in stented lesions.

Authors:  R Hoffmann; G S Mintz; J J Popma; L F Satler; K M Kent; A D Pichard; M B Leon
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Comparison of the morphological changes of restenosis after the implantation of various types of stents in a swine model.

Authors:  Minoru Yorozuya; Hiroshi Suzuki; Yoshitaka Iso; Masayuki Shibata; Masaki Nakatani; Shinji Koba; Mikitaka Murakami; Takashi Katagiri; Youichi Takeyama
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia.

Authors:  R Kornowski; M K Hong; F O Tio; O Bramwell; H Wu; M B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Coronary artery stretch versus deep injury in the development of in-stent neointima.

Authors:  J Gunn; N Arnold; K H Chan; L Shepherd; D C Cumberland; D C Crossman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey W Moses; Jeffrey J Popma; Donald Cutlip; Peter J Fitzgerald; Charles Brown; Tim Fischell; Shing Chiu Wong; Mark Midei; David Snead; Richard E Kuntz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Morice; Patrick W Serruys; J Eduardo Sousa; Jean Fajadet; Ernesto Ban Hayashi; Marco Perin; Antonio Colombo; G Schuler; Paul Barragan; Giulio Guagliumi; Ferenc Molnàr; Robert Falotico
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Coronary stenting: why size matters.

Authors:  Edoardo De Benedetti; Philip Urban
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Differences in Vascular Response between Balloon Overstretch and Stent Overexpansion in Nonatherosclerotic Porcine Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Mitsutake; Jörg Reifart; Wook Bum Pyun; Jennifer K Lyons; Tobias Deuse; Sonja Schrepfer; Fumiaki Ikeno
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  One-year outcomes of novel BioMime Morph tapered stent in long and multiple coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Yash Paul Sharma; Lipi Uppal; Prashant Panda; Soumitra Mohanty; Ganesh Kasinadhuni; Darshan Krishnappa; Saurabh Mehrotra; Ankur Gupta; Krishna Prasad; Krishna Santosh; Dinakar Bootla; Soumitra Ghosh
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Early Australian experience with intravascular lithotripsy treatment of severe calcific coronary stenosis: IVL in acute/chronic coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Ata Doost; James Marangou; Thato Mabote; Gerald Yong; Sharad Shetty; Alan Whelan; Matthew Erickson; Michael Nguyen; Christopher Judkins; Anthony Putrino; Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; Richard Clugston; James Rankin
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Delivery site of perivascular endothelial cell matrices determines control of stenosis in a porcine femoral stent model.

Authors:  Helen M Nugent; Yin-Shan Ng; Desmond White; Adam Groothius; Glenn Kanner; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Stenting-induced Vasa Vasorum compression and subsequent flow resistance: a finite element study.

Authors:  Andrea Corti; Annalisa De Paolis; John Tarbell; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-08-04

7.  Coronary Aneurysm Formation After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation Resulting in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Ching-Chang Fang; Yeun Tarl Fresner Ng Jao
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.