Literature DB >> 17638928

Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.

Katherine Lietz1, James W Long, Abdallah G Kfoury, Mark S Slaughter, Marc A Silver, Carmelo A Milano, Joseph G Rogers, Yoshifumi Naka, Donna Mancini, Leslie W Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The landmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) trial first demonstrated that implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) can provide survival superior to any known medical treatment in patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for transplantation. In the present study, we describe outcomes of DT in the post-REMATCH era in the United States. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The present study included 280 patients who underwent HeartMate XVE LVAD implantation between November 2001 and December 2005. A preoperative risk score for in-hospital mortality after LVAD implantation was established in 222 patients with complete data. All patients were followed up until death or December 2006. The 1-year survival after LVAD implantation was 56%. The in-hospital mortality after LVAD surgery was 27%. The main causes of death included sepsis, right heart failure, and multiorgan failure. The most important determinants of in-hospital mortality were poor nutrition, hematological abnormalities, markers of end-organ or right ventricular dysfunction, and lack of inotropic support. Stratification of DT candidates into low (n=65), medium (n=111), high (n=28), and very high (n=18) risk on the basis of the risk score calculated from these predictors corresponded with 1-year survival rates of 81%, 62%, 28%, and 11%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate selection of candidates and timing of LVAD implantation are critical for improved outcomes of DT. Patients with advanced heart failure who are referred for DT before major complications of heart failure develop have the best chance of achieving an excellent 1-year survival with LVAD therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638928     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  131 in total

1.  A fluid dynamics study in a 50 cc pulsatile ventricular assist device: influence of heart rate variability.

Authors:  Jason C Nanna; Michael A Navitsky; Stephen R Topper; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The first clinical case in Japan of destination therapy using the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Sokichi Kamata; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Takashi Yamauchi; Koji Takeda; Shunsuke Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Saito
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-19

4.  Pulsatile support using a rotary left ventricular assist device with an electrocardiography-synchronized rotational speed control mode for tracking heart rate variability.

Authors:  Mamoru Arakawa; Takashi Nishimura; Yoshiaki Takewa; Akihide Umeki; Masahiko Ando; Yuichiro Kishimoto; Satoru Kishimoto; Yutaka Fujii; Kazuma Date; Shunei Kyo; Hideo Adachi; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  Short and long term outcomes of 200 patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsiouris; Gaetano Paone; Hassan W Nemeh; Jamil Borgi; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 6.  The future of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  The practical role of echocardiography in selection, implantation, and management of patients requiring LVAD therapy.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Todaro; Bijoy K Khandheria; Timothy E Paterick; Matt M Umland; Vinay Thohan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Predictors of hospital length of stay after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: an analysis of the INTERMACS registry.

Authors:  William G Cotts; Edwin C McGee; Susan L Myers; David C Naftel; James B Young; James K Kirklin; Kathleen L Grady
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Dying With a Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Jacob J Strand; Sara E Wordingham; John M Stulak; Angela J Luckhardt; Keith M Swetz
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Failing Heart: Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Joseph A R Englert; Jennifer A Davis; Selim R Krim
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.