| Literature DB >> 26608806 |
Mamoru Arakawa1,2, Takashi Nishimura3, Yoshiaki Takewa4, Akihide Umeki5, Masahiko Ando5, Yuichiro Kishimoto4, Satoru Kishimoto4, Yutaka Fujii4, Kazuma Date5, Shunei Kyo6, Hideo Adachi7, Eisuke Tatsumi4.
Abstract
We previously developed a novel control system for a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD), the EVAHEART, and demonstrated that sufficient pulsatility can be created by increasing its rotational speed in the systolic phase (pulsatile mode) in a normal heart animal model. In the present study, we assessed this system in its reliability and ability to follow heart rate variability. We implanted an EVAHEART via left thoracotomy into five goats for the Study for Fixed Heart Rate with ventricular pacing at 80, 100, 120 and 140 beats/min and six goats for the Study for native heart rhythm. We tested three modes: the circuit clamp, the continuous mode and the pulsatile mode. In the pulsatile mode, rotational speed was increased during the initial 35 % of the RR interval by automatic control based on the electrocardiogram. Pulsatility was evaluated by pulse pressure and dP/dt max of aortic pressure. As a result, comparing the pulsatile mode with the continuous mode, the pulse pressure was 28.5 ± 5.7 vs. 20.3 ± 7.9 mmHg, mean dP/dt max was 775.0 ± 230.5 vs 442.4 ± 184.7 mmHg/s at 80 bpm in the study for fixed heart rate, respectively (P < 0.05). The system successfully determined the heart rate to be 94.6 % in native heart rhythm. Furthermore, pulse pressure was 41.5 ± 7.9 vs. 27.8 ± 5.6 mmHg, mean dP/dt max was 716.2 ± 133.9 vs 405.2 ± 86.0 mmHg/s, respectively (P < 0.01). In conclusion, our newly developed the pulsatile mode for continuous-flow LVADs reliably provided physiological pulsatility with following heart rate variability.Entities:
Keywords: EVAHEART; LVAD; Rotary blood pump
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26608806 DOI: 10.1007/s10047-015-0875-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Artif Organs ISSN: 1434-7229 Impact factor: 1.731