Literature DB >> 15148189

Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.

Ann E Geers1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether age at cochlear implantation or duration of implant use is associated with speech, language, and reading skills exhibited at age 8 to 9 years in children who underwent implantation by age 5 years.
DESIGN: Performance outcomes in speech perception, speech production, language, and reading were examined in terms of the age at which children first received a cochlear implant (2, 3, or 4 years), the age they received an updated (Spectra) processor, and the duration of use of an implant and an updated processor.
SETTING: Data collection was conducted at summer research camps held over 4 consecutive years to maximize the number of children available at a specific age (8-9 years). Children were tested individually by experienced examiners, and their parents and therapists provided background and educational history information. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 181 children from 33 different states and 5 Canadian provinces who received a cochlear implant by age 5 years were tested. A subsample of 133 children with performance IQ scores of 80 or greater and onset of deafness at birth were selected for the age-at-implantation analysis. Another subsample of 39 children with deafness acquired by age 3 years was also examined. OUTCOME MEASURES: A battery of tests of speech perception, speech production, language, and reading was administered to each child and reduced to a single factor score for each skill.
RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between age at implantation and duration of use did not reach significance for any of the outcome skills measured. Age at which the updated speech processor (Spectra) was fitted was significantly related to speech production outcome (earlier use of an updated processor was associated with greater speech intelligibility) but not to any other skill area. However, more of the children who underwent implantation at age 2 years (43%) achieved combined speech and language skills commensurate with their age-matched peers with normal hearing than did children who underwent implantation at age 4 years (16%). Furthermore, normal speech and language skills were documented in 80% of children who lost hearing after birth and who underwent implantation within a year of onset of deafness.
CONCLUSIONS: For children who receive a cochlear implant between the ages of 2 and 4 years, early cochlear implantation does not ensure better speech perception, speech production, language, or reading skills. However, greater speech and language proficiency may be expected from children who exhibit normal hearing for even a brief period after birth and receive a cochlear implant shortly after losing their hearing. Further research examining the benefits of cochlear implantation before age 2 years will help families and clinicians better understand the time-sensitive nature of the decision to conduct cochlear implant surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148189     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  59 in total

Review 1.  Public health and laboratory considerations regarding newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  Sheila C Dollard; Mark R Schleiss; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Phonological awareness, reading skills, and vocabulary knowledge in children who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caitlin M Dillon; Kenneth de Jong; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2011-11-03

3.  Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Johanna Grant Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  AAV-Mediated Neurotrophin Gene Therapy Promotes Improved Survival of Cochlear Spiral Ganglion Neurons in Neonatally Deafened Cats: Comparison of AAV2-hBDNF and AAV5-hGDNF.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Stephen J Rebscher; Chantale Dore'; Omar Akil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-20

5.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spoken english language development among native signing children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kathryn Davidson; Diane Lillo-Martin; Deborah Chen Pichler
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2013-10-21

Review 7.  [Newborn hearing impairment. Epidemiology and therapeutic relevance].

Authors:  G Reuter; C Krauth; T Lenarz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Using early language outcomes to predict later language ability in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Karen Iler Kirk; Shirley C Henning; Sujuan Gao; Rong Qi
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Characteristics of malfunctioning channels in pediatric cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jerry W Lin; Avni Mody; Ross Tonini; Claudia Emery; Jody Haymond; Jeffrey T Vrabec; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  [Long-term functional outcomes of cochlear implants in children].

Authors:  R Laszig; A Aschendorff; R Beck; C Schild; S Kröger; T Wesarg; S Arndt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.