Literature DB >> 16602285

Opposite shifts in size at metamorphosis in response to larval and metamorph predators.

James R Vonesh1, Karen M Warkentin.   

Abstract

Predation risk can cause organisms to alter the timing of life history switch points. Theory suggests that increased risk in an early life stage should select for switching earlier and smaller, while increased risk in the subsequent stage should select for switching later and larger. This framework has frequently been applied to metamorphosis in amphibians, with mixed results. Few studies examining the effect of larval predation risk on metamorphosis have observed the predicted pattern, and no studies, to our knowledge, have examined the effect of increased risk during and after metamorphosis on the timing of this switch point. Here we examine the effect of larval and post-metamorphic predation risk on metamorphosis in the red-eyed treefrog, Agalychnis callidryas. We raised tadpoles in the presence or absence of cues from caged water bugs fed larvae and cues from spiders fed emerging metamorphs. Water bugs are effective larval predators, while spiders are poor larval predators but prey on metamorphs. Furthermore, since spiders forage on the water surface it is possible that tadpoles could assess future risk from this predator. Predators induced opposite shifts in life history. Tadpoles emerged smaller and less developed in response to water bugs, but later and larger in response to spiders. Interestingly, predator effects on larval duration were not independent; tadpoles delayed emerging in response to spiders, but only in the absence of water bugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16602285     DOI: 10.1890/05-0930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  16 in total

1.  Irreversibility of a bad start: early exposure to osmotic stress limits growth and adaptive developmental plasticity.

Authors:  Chi-Shiun Wu; Ivan Gomez-Mestre; Yeong-Choy Kam
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Conspecific density determines the magnitude and character of predator-induced phenotype.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Prey subsidy or predator cue? Direct and indirect effects of caged predators on aquatic consumers and resources.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Variability in life-history switch points across and within populations explained by Adaptive Dynamics.

Authors:  Pietro Landi; James R Vonesh; Cang Hui
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Consequences of intraspecific niche variation: phenotypic similarity increases competition among recently metamorphosed frogs.

Authors:  Michael F Benard; Jessica Middlemis Maher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Carry-over effects of the larval environment on post-metamorphic performance in two hylid frogs.

Authors:  Benjamin G Van Allen; Venetia S Briggs; Michael W McCoy; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Behavioral plasticity mitigates risk across environments and predators during anuran metamorphosis.

Authors:  Justin C Touchon; Randall R Jiménez; Shane H Abinette; James R Vonesh; Karen M Warkentin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Clutch identity and predator-induced hatching affect behavior and development in a leaf-breeding treefrog.

Authors:  Megan E Gibbons; M Patricia George
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Phenotypically plastic responses of green frog embryos to conflicting predation risk.

Authors:  D H Ireland; A J Wirsing; D L Murray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Prey responses to predator chemical cues: disentangling the importance of the number and biomass of prey consumed.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy; Justin C Touchon; Tobias Landberg; Karen M Warkentin; James R Vonesh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.