Literature DB >> 17635965

Feasibility of using MRI alone for 3D radiation treatment planning in brain tumors.

R Prabhakar1, P K Julka, T Ganesh, A Munshi, R C Joshi, G K Rath.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish whether radiation treatment planning using MRI alone could replace CT-based planning for brain tumors while retaining the dosimetric accuracy. This would help to provide a single imaging modality for both target delineation as well as treatment planning, thus saving time and resources.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with brain tumors were scanned on a spiral CT scanner and 1.5 T MRI scanner. Three treatment plans were generated for all patients. The first plan was generated using the CT scan images with inhomogeneity correction (CT + IC); the second plan used the CT scan without inhomogeneity correction (CT-IC) and the third plan was generated using the MRI scan (MRI alone).
RESULTS: The maximum distortion in the MRI phantom study was less than 1 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the target coverage parameters analysed in this study. Similarly, the maximum antero-posterior and lateral dimensions for the CT-based and MRI-based planning did not show any statistical difference.
CONCLUSION: MRI-based treatment planning for brain lesions is feasible and gives equivalent dosimetric results compared to CT-based treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635965     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hym050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  12 in total

1.  Concurrent segmentation of the prostate on MRI and CT via linked statistical shape models for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Najeeb Chowdhury; Robert Toth; Jonathan Chappelow; Sung Kim; Sabin Motwani; Salman Punekar; Haibo Lin; Stefan Both; Neha Vapiwala; Stephen Hahn; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Authors:  Ilamurugu Arivarasan; Chandrasekaran Anuradha; Shanmuga Subramanian; Ayyalusamy Anantharaman; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Magnus G Karlsson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Prospective observer and software-based assessment of magnetic resonance imaging quality in head and neck cancer: Should standard positioning and immobilization be required for radiation therapy applications?

Authors:  Yao Ding; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jinzhong Yang; Rivka R Colen; Steven J Frank; Jihong Wang; Eslam Y Wassal; Wenjie Wang; Michael E Kantor; Peter A Balter; David I Rosenthal; Stephen Y Lai; John D Hazle; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-17

5.  Evaluation of Dosimetric Robustness of Carbon Ion Boost Therapy for Anal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kim Melanie Kraus; Asja Pfaffenberger; Oliver Jäkel; Jürgen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2017-03-14

6.  Accuracy of inverse treatment planning on substitute CT images derived from MR data for brain lesions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Mohammad M Akhtari; Magnus G Karlsson; Adam Johansson; Thomas Asklund; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Evaluating organ delineation, dose calculation and daily localization in an open-MRI simulation workflow for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Anthony Doemer; Indrin J Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst; Teamour Nurushev; David Hearshen; Milan Pantelic; Melanie Traughber; Joshua Kim; Kenneth Levin; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Eleanor Walker; Benjamin Movsas
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Comparison of bulk electron density and voxel-based electron density treatment planning.

Authors:  Aliaksandr Karotki; Katherine Mah; Gert Meijer; Michael Meltsner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Assessment of positional reproducibility in the head and neck on a 1.5-T MR simulator for an offline MR-guided radiotherapy solution.

Authors:  Yihang Zhou; Jing Yuan; Oi Lei Wong; Winky Wing Ki Fung; Ka Fai Cheng; Kin Yin Cheung; Siu Ki Yu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-10

10.  Variability in prostate and seminal vesicle delineations defined on magnetic resonance images, a multi-observer, -center and -sequence study.

Authors:  Tufve Nyholm; Joakim Jonsson; Karin Söderström; Per Bergström; Andreas Carlberg; Gunilla Frykholm; Claus F Behrens; Poul Flemming Geertsen; Redas Trepiakas; Scott Hanvey; Azmat Sadozye; Jawaher Ansari; Hazel McCallum; John Frew; Rhona McMenemin; Björn Zackrisson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.