PURPOSE: Although there is evidence for interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and estrogen receptor (ER), it is still not clear how this affects response to endocrine therapies like tamoxifen. Here we assess the relationship between EGFR expression and tamoxifen response, with a new quantitative technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed from breast cancer from a cohort of 564 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial for adjuvant tamoxifentreatment in early breast cancer, with a median follow-up of 14 years. EGFR expression was measured using automated quantitative analysis, a fluorescence-based method for quantitative analysis of in situ protein expression. RESULTS: In ER-positive patients, tamoxifen-treated patients with low EGFR expression (n = 113) showed a significant effect by 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (P = .01), in contrast to no treatment effect in the EGFR-high group (n = 73, P = .69). The untreated group showed 49% v 57% 10-year recurrence-free survival for EGFR low versus high (P = .466) in the corresponding group of ER-positive patients. A significant beneficial effect of tamoxifen treatment was seen in the EGFR-low group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.84; P = .013) in contrast to no effect in the EGFR-high group (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.59 to 2.22; P = .7) by using a Cox model. CONCLUSION: This study provides clinical evidence that confirms the basic work that has shown high EGFR can indicate resistance to tamoxifen. It suggests that careful measurement of EGFR protein expression might define a subset of low-stage patients that could benefit from an alternative therapy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Although there is evidence for interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and estrogen receptor (ER), it is still not clear how this affects response to endocrine therapies like tamoxifen. Here we assess the relationship between EGFR expression and tamoxifen response, with a new quantitative technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed from breast cancer from a cohort of 564 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial for adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in early breast cancer, with a median follow-up of 14 years. EGFR expression was measured using automated quantitative analysis, a fluorescence-based method for quantitative analysis of in situ protein expression. RESULTS: In ER-positive patients, tamoxifen-treated patients with low EGFR expression (n = 113) showed a significant effect by 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (P = .01), in contrast to no treatment effect in the EGFR-high group (n = 73, P = .69). The untreated group showed 49% v 57% 10-year recurrence-free survival for EGFR low versus high (P = .466) in the corresponding group of ER-positive patients. A significant beneficial effect of tamoxifen treatment was seen in the EGFR-low group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.84; P = .013) in contrast to no effect in the EGFR-high group (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.59 to 2.22; P = .7) by using a Cox model. CONCLUSION: This study provides clinical evidence that confirms the basic work that has shown high EGFR can indicate resistance to tamoxifen. It suggests that careful measurement of EGFR protein expression might define a subset of low-stage patients that could benefit from an alternative therapy.
Authors: Allison W Welsh; Christopher B Moeder; Sudha Kumar; Peter Gershkovich; Elaine T Alarid; Malini Harigopal; Bruce G Haffty; David L Rimm Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Allison W Welsh; Donald R Lannin; Gregory S Young; Mark E Sherman; Jonine D Figueroa; N Lynn Henry; Lisa Ryden; Chungyeul Kim; Richard R Love; Rachel Schiff; David L Rimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rikke H Dahlrot; Mia D Sørensen; Ann Mari Rosager; Sofie Hellwege; Julie A Bangsø; Tine Rosenberg; Stine A Petterson; Jacob Klitkou; Sigurd Fosmark; Steinbjørn Hansen; Bjarne W Kristensen Journal: CNS Oncol Date: 2014-07
Authors: Amy R Peck; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Chengbao Liu; Ginger A Stringer; Alexander C Klimowicz; Edward Pequignot; Boris Freydin; Thai H Tran; Ning Yang; Anne L Rosenberg; Jeffrey A Hooke; Albert J Kovatich; Marja T Nevalainen; Craig D Shriver; Terry Hyslop; Guido Sauter; David L Rimm; Anthony M Magliocco; Hallgeir Rui Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rikke H Dahlrot; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jørn Herrstedt; Henrik D Schrøder; Jacob Hjelmborg; Bjarne W Kristensen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mothaffar F Rimawi; Priya B Shetty; Heidi L Weiss; Rachel Schiff; C Kent Osborne; Gary C Chamness; Richard M Elledge Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Vladimir Tolmachev; Daniel Rosik; Helena Wållberg; Anna Sjöberg; Mattias Sandström; Monika Hansson; Anders Wennborg; Anna Orlova Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 9.236