Literature DB >> 17634479

Quantitative measurement of epidermal growth factor receptor is a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response in hormone receptor positive premenopausal breast cancer.

Jennifer M Giltnane1, Lisa Rydén, Melissa Cregger, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Karin Jirström, David L Rimm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although there is evidence for interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and estrogen receptor (ER), it is still not clear how this affects response to endocrine therapies like tamoxifen. Here we assess the relationship between EGFR expression and tamoxifen response, with a new quantitative technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A tissue microarray was constructed from breast cancer from a cohort of 564 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial for adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in early breast cancer, with a median follow-up of 14 years. EGFR expression was measured using automated quantitative analysis, a fluorescence-based method for quantitative analysis of in situ protein expression.
RESULTS: In ER-positive patients, tamoxifen-treated patients with low EGFR expression (n = 113) showed a significant effect by 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen (P = .01), in contrast to no treatment effect in the EGFR-high group (n = 73, P = .69). The untreated group showed 49% v 57% 10-year recurrence-free survival for EGFR low versus high (P = .466) in the corresponding group of ER-positive patients. A significant beneficial effect of tamoxifen treatment was seen in the EGFR-low group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.84; P = .013) in contrast to no effect in the EGFR-high group (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 0.59 to 2.22; P = .7) by using a Cox model.
CONCLUSION: This study provides clinical evidence that confirms the basic work that has shown high EGFR can indicate resistance to tamoxifen. It suggests that careful measurement of EGFR protein expression might define a subset of low-stage patients that could benefit from an alternative therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17634479     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  24 in total

Review 1.  Identifying and targeting tumor-initiating cells in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.678

2.  Limitations in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy: The Predictive Potential of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Patrick Thurner; Christian Nanoff
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Standardization of estrogen receptor measurement in breast cancer suggests false-negative results are a function of threshold intensity rather than percentage of positive cells.

Authors:  Allison W Welsh; Christopher B Moeder; Sudha Kumar; Peter Gershkovich; Elaine T Alarid; Malini Harigopal; Bruce G Haffty; David L Rimm
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Cytoplasmic estrogen receptor in breast cancer.

Authors:  Allison W Welsh; Donald R Lannin; Gregory S Young; Mark E Sherman; Jonine D Figueroa; N Lynn Henry; Lisa Ryden; Chungyeul Kim; Richard R Love; Rachel Schiff; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Novel approaches for quantifying protein biomarkers in gliomas: benefits and pitfalls.

Authors:  Rikke H Dahlrot; Mia D Sørensen; Ann Mari Rosager; Sofie Hellwege; Julie A Bangsø; Tine Rosenberg; Stine A Petterson; Jacob Klitkou; Sigurd Fosmark; Steinbjørn Hansen; Bjarne W Kristensen
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-07

6.  Loss of nuclear localized and tyrosine phosphorylated Stat5 in breast cancer predicts poor clinical outcome and increased risk of antiestrogen therapy failure.

Authors:  Amy R Peck; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Chengbao Liu; Ginger A Stringer; Alexander C Klimowicz; Edward Pequignot; Boris Freydin; Thai H Tran; Ning Yang; Anne L Rosenberg; Jeffrey A Hooke; Albert J Kovatich; Marja T Nevalainen; Craig D Shriver; Terry Hyslop; Guido Sauter; David L Rimm; Anthony M Magliocco; Hallgeir Rui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic value of Musashi-1 in gliomas.

Authors:  Rikke H Dahlrot; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jørn Herrstedt; Henrik D Schrøder; Jacob Hjelmborg; Bjarne W Kristensen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer association with biologic phenotype and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mothaffar F Rimawi; Priya B Shetty; Heidi L Weiss; Rachel Schiff; C Kent Osborne; Gary C Chamness; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Imaging of EGFR expression in murine xenografts using site-specifically labelled anti-EGFR 111In-DOTA-Z EGFR:2377 Affibody molecule: aspect of the injected tracer amount.

Authors:  Vladimir Tolmachev; Daniel Rosik; Helena Wållberg; Anna Sjöberg; Mattias Sandström; Monika Hansson; Anders Wennborg; Anna Orlova
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Clinical utility of the combination of lapatinib and letrozole in the management of hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Priscilla Merriam; William M Sikov
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2011-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.