Literature DB >> 17634334

Evidence for distinct, differentially adaptable sensorimotor transformations for reaches to visual and proprioceptive targets.

Pierre-Michel Bernier1, Gabriel M Gauthier, Jean Blouin.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that planning a reaching movement entails similar stages and common networks irrespective of whether the target location is defined through visual or proprioceptive cues. Here we test whether the transformations that convert the sensory information regarding target location into the required motor output are common for both types of reaches. To do so, we adaptively modified these sensorimotor transformations through exposure to displacing prisms and hypothesized that if they are common to both types of reaches, the aftereffects observed for reaches to visual targets would generalize to reaches to a proprioceptive target. Subjects (n = 16) were divided into two groups that differed with respect to the sensory modality of the targets (visual or proprioceptive) used in the pre- and posttests. The adaptation phase was identical for both groups and consisted of movements toward visual targets while wearing 10.5 degrees horizontally displacing prisms. We observed large aftereffects consistent with the magnitude of the prism-induced shift when reaching toward visual targets in the posttest, but no significant aftereffects for movements toward the proprioceptive target. These results provide evidence that distinct, differentially adaptable sensorimotor transformations underlie the planning of reaches to visual and proprioceptive targets.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17634334     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00570.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  A dissociation between visual and motor workspace inhibits generalization of visuomotor adaptation across the limbs.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of visuomotor adaptation on proprioceptive localization: the contributions of perceptual and motor changes.

Authors:  Holly A Clayton; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation to proprioceptive targets following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jenna C Flannigan; Ruth J Posthuma; Jesse N Lombardo; Chelsea Murray; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations.

Authors:  F R Sarlegna; A Przybyla; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?

Authors:  Rachel Goodman; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  State Estimation for Early Feedback Responses in Reaching: Intramodal or Multimodal?

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Auditory cues for somatosensory targets invoke visuomotor transformations: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Gerome A Manson; Luc Tremblay; Nicolas Lebar; John de Grosbois; Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Tendon Vibration on Hemiparetic Arm Stability in Unstable Workspaces.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Bani Gadhoke; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.