Literature DB >> 29696313

Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?

Rachel Goodman1, Luc Tremblay2.   

Abstract

Visual feedback is crucial for movement accuracy (e.g., Keele and Posner, J Exp Psychol 77:155-158, 1968). As well, proprioception has been argued to be important for the control of voluntary movements (e.g., Bagesteiro et al., Exp Brain Res 171:358-370, 2006; Rossetti et al., J Neurophysiol 74:457-463, 1995). While tendon vibration (TVib) has been used to perturb proprioceptive information during limb matching tasks (Goodwin et al., Science 175:1382-1384, 1972), the current study employed between-trial dual-muscle TVib, coupled with vision occlusion, to assess the use of vision and proprioception for the online control of voluntary movements. Participants (n = 17) performed an upper-limb reaching task (30 cm). TVib influenced both accuracy and precision of movement endpoint. Critically, variability analyses showed that participant's performance was most affected by TVib at 75% of the movement duration, even in the presence of vision. These findings demonstrate that between-trial dual-muscle tendon vibration can perturb proprioceptive feedback, and further, suggest that proprioception can be important for the online control of reaches, even when vision is available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor control; Online control; Reaching; Somatosensory; Tendon vibration; Visual

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696313     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5258-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation.

Authors:  C Redon; L Hay; J L Velay
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: a framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming.

Authors:  Digby Elliott; Steven Hansen; Jocelyn Mendoza; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 3.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Kinematic analysis of early online control of goal-directed reaches: a novel movement perturbation study.

Authors:  Lawrence E M Grierson; Claudia Gonzalez; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Muscle spindle activity following muscle tendon vibration in man.

Authors:  E Ribot-Ciscar; C Rossi-Durand; J P Roll
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Feedback control during voluntary motor actions.

Authors:  Stephen H Scott; Tyler Cluff; Catherine R Lowrey; Tomohiko Takei
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: kinematic evidence.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Digby Elliot; Jamie Coull; Romeo Chua; James Lyons
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Response feedback and motor learning.

Authors:  J A Adams; E T Goetz; P H Marshall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-03

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Visual feedback from a virtual body modulates motor illusion induced by tendon vibration.

Authors:  Gabriele Fusco; Gaetano Tieri; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-10

2.  The role of conflict, feedback, and action comprehension in monitoring of action errors: Evidence for internal and external routes.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Louisa L Smith; H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Visual and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of precision manual motor control in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Robin L Shafer; Zheng Wang; James Bartolotti; Matthew W Mosconi
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Contributions of exercise-induced fatigue versus intertrial tendon vibration on visual-proprioceptive weighting for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Damian M Manzone; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Proprioceptive Augmentation With Illusory Kinaesthetic Sensation in Stroke Patients Improves Movement Quality in an Active Upper Limb Reach-and-Point Task.

Authors:  Francesca Ferrari; Courtney E Shell; Zachary C Thumser; Francesco Clemente; Ela B Plow; Christian Cipriani; Paul D Marasco
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Vision facilitates tactile perception when grasping an object.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Francisco L Colino; Xhino Meleqi; Gordon Binsted; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Actual and Illusory Perception in Parkinson's Disease and Dystonia: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Laura Avanzino; Mirta Fiorio; Antonella Conte
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  The Mediating Role of Vision in the Relationship between Proprioception and Postural Control in Older Adults, as Compared to Teenagers and Younger and Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Ainhoa Nieto-Guisado; Monica Solana-Tramunt; Adrià Marco-Ahulló; Marta Sevilla-Sánchez; Cristina Cabrejas; Josep Campos-Rius; Jose Morales
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.