Literature DB >> 17632147

Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer.

Erik Kouba1, Matt Sands, Aaron Lentz, Eric Wallen, Raj S Pruthi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study we examined the incidence and associated factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer. In addition, we evaluated the treatment and outcomes of surgical procedures in patients in whom stoma related complications developed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2005 a total of 137 patients underwent ileal conduit diversion after cystectomy or exploration for bladder cancer, had complete clinical followup and were followed for at least 12 months after surgery. The incidence of stomal complications (including parastomal hernia, stomal stenosis and stomal prolapse) is reported with correlations made to age, race, gender, body mass index, smoking history, alcohol consumption, preoperative laboratory values (creatinine, hematocrit), operative estimated blood loss and surgical complications. In addition, management of stomal complications is reported.
RESULTS: Of the 137 patients 21 stomal complications (15.3%) occurred in 20 patients (14.6%). The most common complication was parastomal hernia in 19 patients (13.9 %). Stomal stenosis developed in 1 patient (0.7%) and stomal prolapse developed in 1 patient with a parastomal hernia (0.7%). There were no significant differences in gender, age, race, preoperative laboratory values or history of abdominal/pelvic radiation therapy between patients with or without complications. However, patients in whom complications developed had a significantly higher mean body mass index compared to those without complications (30.8 vs 26.5 kg/m(2), respectively, p = 0.012). Operative outcomes, extent of disease and length of postoperative followup were also similar between patients with or without stomal complications. In addition, there were no significant differences in lifestyle factors (eg smoking, alcohol abuse) in patients in whom complications developed.
CONCLUSIONS: Stomal complications associated with ileal conduit urinary diversion are not uncommon and occur in almost 15% of patients, with the most common problem being parastomal hernia. Evaluation of possible risk factors demonstrates that obesity may be a contributing factor in the development of stomal complications, particularly in the elderly. Furthermore, our experience suggests that subsequent repairs of parastomal hernias are only moderately successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632147     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Preoperative and modifiable factors to lower postoperative complications after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Marie C Hupe; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sunil K Narang; Nasra N Alam; Nick J Campain; Samir Pathak; John S McGrath; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  The influence of specific technical maneuvers utilized in the creation of diverting loop-ileostomies on stoma-related morbidity.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Masataka Ikeda; Masaki Tujie; Junichi Hasegawa; Masayuki Ohue; Takeshi Kato; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Rationale and Early Experience with Prophylactic Placement of Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia Formation after Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion and Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy F Donahue; Eugene K Cha; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  [Imperative cystectomy in patients at risk. Ileal conduit or ureterocutaneostomy?].

Authors:  S Degener; A S Brandt; D A Lazica; F-C von Rundstedt; M J Mathers; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Timothy F Donahue; Bernard H Bochner; John P Sfakianos; Matthew Kent; Melanie Bernstein; William M Hilton; Eugene K Cha; Alyssa M Yee; Guido Dalbagni; Hebert A Vargas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Experiences with a prophylactic mesh in 93 consecutive ostomies.

Authors:  Arthur Jänes; Yucel Cengiz; Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Readmission after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: outcomes and predictors at 90-day follow-up.

Authors:  Ali Al-Daghmin; Ahmed Aboumohamed; Rakeeba Din; Aabroo Khan; Syed Johar Raza; Jenna Sztorc; Diana Mehedint; Mohammad Sharif; Yi Shi; Gregory Wilding; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  [Follow-up care - consequences of urinary diversion after bladder cancer].

Authors:  S Degener; S Roth; M J Mathers; B Ubrig
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.