[Imperative cystectomy in patients at risk. Ileal conduit or ureterocutaneostomy?].

Due to the demographic trends, the incidence of bladder cancer will rise. Based on progress in perioperative management, radical cystectomy has become feasible also in elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Also caused by the increase of age-related comorbidities, the question arises as to the optimal urinary diversion in patients at risk. The ileal conduit is the accepted standard due to its safe, well-proven, and low-risk performance. Nevertheless, it was shown to have relevant complication rates in patients at risk, mostly because of the bowel involvement. The ureterocutaneostomy is a safer and easier alternative, which was initially shown to have a high rate of stomal stenosis. However, new data suggest that the stent-free rate is comparable to the ileal conduit. In addition, quality of life analyses show comparable results. Therefore, ureterocutaneostomy should be considered as an option for urinary diversion in patients at risk.