Literature DB >> 10931055

Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic.

P J Cant1, D S Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The '2 week wait' directive (Health Service Circular (HSC) 1998/242) guaranteeing that 'everyone with suspected breast cancer will be able to see a specialist within two weeks of their general practitioner (GP) deciding they need to be seen urgently' is a unique audited approach to access for the British National Health Service, the effects of which have been assessed in a non-academic symptomatic breast clinic.
METHODS: New GP referrals (n = 607) were reviewed prospectively in two comparable 3-month intervals, beginning 1 April 1998 and 1 April 1999, to determine the probability of a breast cancer diagnosis from the referral letter and the effects of the directive on waiting times for appointments and utilization of clinics.
RESULTS: The urgency of referral was not specified in 53 per cent of GP referrals. For the 'urgent' cases (25 per cent of all new referrals) the probability of a final diagnosis of breast cancer was 0.19. The breast specialists prospectively achieved a rate of 0.26 from 99 per cent of the same referral letters. 'Urgent' referrals did not wait significantly longer in 1999 (median 9 versus 10 days) but waiting times for new appointments overall increased (13 versus 16 days; P < 0.01), and this was greatest for 'routine' [14] versus 21 days; P < 0.001). These changes were caused by an increase in the number of clinic appointments, due to significant increases in median number of visits to diagnosis or discharge and clinic non-attendance in 1999, resulting in overbooking. Telephonic communications were associated with faster median access times (fax 8 days; telephone 2 days), relative to mailed [19] days) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Breast specialists were better overall at assessing the probability of a breast cancer diagnosis. The waiting time for 'urgent' appointments was unchanged following HSC 1998/242, but there was an increased wait for other patients, especially those assessed as having a lower probability of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931055     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01551.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  11 in total

1.  Addressing the challenges of queues.

Authors:  Dalia L Rotstein; David A Alter; Dalis L Rotstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Do GP referral guidelines really work? Audit of an electronic urgent referral system for suspected head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Maree Kennedy; Abdul Aziz; Sameena Khalid; David Hurman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Follow-up care in cancer: adjusting for referral targets and extending choice.

Authors:  Kate Wilson; Anne Lydon; Ziv Amir
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Managing the 2-week wait for breast patients.

Authors:  Rishi Singhal; Ravi Marudanayagam; B Balasubramanian; I S Paterson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  An audit of urology two-week wait referrals in a large teaching hospital in England.

Authors:  Anup Mathew; K M Desai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Sasi Govindarajulu; Mike Shere; Fiona Braddon; Geoffrey Curran; Rosemary Greenwood; Ajay K Sahu; Simon J Cawthorn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-13

7.  Identifying suspected breast cancer: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Colin McCowan; Peter T Donnan; John Dewar; Alastair Thompson; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  The two-week-wait cancer initiative in urology: useful modernization?

Authors:  Darrell Allen; Rick Popert; Tim O'Brien
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  The effectiveness of "two-week" referrals for suspected bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  A Malik; L Wigney; S Murray; C H Gerrand
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2007

10.  Effect of the UK government's 2-week target on waiting times in women with breast cancer in southeast England.

Authors:  D Robinson; C M J Bell; H Møller; I Basnett
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.