Literature DB >> 17631354

Complications of laparoscopic surgery for urological cancer: a single institution analysis.

Jose R Colombo1, Georges-Pascal Haber, J Eric Jelovsek, Mike Nguyen, Amr Fergany, Mihir M Desai, Jihad H Kaouk, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the incidence of and risk factors for perioperative complications associated with laparoscopic oncological surgery for urological malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All records of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy at a tertiary care institution from April 1997 through January 2006 were reviewed. Relevant demographic and perioperative data during and within 6 weeks of surgery were evaluated retrospectively. Various factors were analyzed to estimate risk of a perioperative complication such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, European Scoring System for laparoscopic urological operations and surgeon experience. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for perioperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 1,867 laparoscopic oncological surgeries were performed, including radical or partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy. Perioperative complications occurred in 12.4% of patients, including 3.5% intraoperatively and 8.9% postoperatively. Intraoperative (2.3%) and postoperative hemorrhage (2.7%) accounted for 40% of all perioperative complications. All cause perioperative mortality occurred in 8 patients (0.4%). On multivariate analysis radical cystectomy (adjusted OR 4.9, p <0.001), partial nephrectomy (adjusted OR 2.4, p <0.001), length of surgery greater than 4 hours (adjusted OR 2.5, p <0.001) and preoperative serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl (adjusted OR 2.1, p = 0.04) were independent risk factors for perioperative complications. Comparing the periods of 1997 to 2000 vs 2001 to 2005, despite a significant increase in technical complexity of procedures (European Scoring System 9.8 vs 60.6, p <0.001), the incidence of complications tended to decrease (17.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.3).
CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients laparoscopic urological oncological surgery is safe. These data on perioperative complications could possibly serve as a reference benchmark for practicing urologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17631354     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.

Authors:  Tomonori Habuchi; Toshiro Terachi; Hiromitsu Mimata; Yukihiro Kondo; Hiroomi Kanayama; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Kikuo Nutahara; Tsuneharu Miki; Yoshinari Ono; Shiro Baba; Seiji Naito; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the complications in transperitoneal laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery with Clavien-Dindo classification.

Authors:  Melih Balcı; Altuğ Tuncel; Özer Güzel; Yılmaz Aslan; Tanju Keten; Ersin Köseoğlu; Anıl Erkan; Ali Atan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

3.  Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures.

Authors:  Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes; Ivan Gonzalez Rodríguez; Rodrigo Gil Ugarteburu; Luis Rodríguez Villamil; Begoña Diaz Mendez; Patricio Suarez Gil; Javier Mosquera Madera
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Incarcerated retroperitoneal hernia following total extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Igor Milosevic; Heath Dorion; Daniel Ricchiuti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Prospective evaluation of complications in laparoscopic urology at a mid-volume institution using standardized criteria: Experience of 1023 cases including learning curve in 9 years.

Authors:  Oner Sanli; Tzevat Tefik; Selcuk Erdem; Mazhar Ortac; Emre Salabas; Serkan Karakus; Baris Yucel; Abubekir Boyuk; Tayfun Oktar; Faruk Ozcan; Necdet Aras; Murat Tunc; Ismet Nane
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Joseph Ciccone; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Zubair M Butt; Gregory E Wilding; Hyung L Kim; James L Mohler; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Vascular anomalies during laparoscopic renal surgery: incidence and management of left-sided inferior vena cava.

Authors:  Timothy K Byler; Grant I S Disick; Ihor S Sawczuk; Ravi Munver
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Surgical complications of laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Lasser; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-01-09

9.  Complications of 411 laparoscopic urological procedures: A single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Otaibi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.