Literature DB >> 17629425

Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulated sounds: deficits after bilateral lesions of auditory cortex in the rat.

James E Cooke1, Huiming Zhang, Jack B Kelly.   

Abstract

The ability of rats to detect the presence of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) of a broadband noise carrier was determined before and after bilateral ablation of auditory cortex. The rats were trained to withdraw from a drinking spout to avoid a shock when they detected a modulation of the sound. Sensitivity was evaluated by testing the rats at progressively smaller depths of modulation. Psychophysical curves were produced to describe the limits of detection at modulation rates of 10, 100 and 1000Hz. Performance scores were based on the probability of withdrawal from the spout during AM (warning periods) relative to withdrawal during the un-modulated noise (safe periods). A threshold was defined as the depth of modulation that produced a score halfway between perfect avoidance and no avoidance (performance score=0.5). Bilateral auditory cortical lesions resulted in significant elevations in threshold for detection of AM at rates of 100 and 1000Hz. No significant shift was found at a modulation rate of 10Hz. The magnitude of the deficit for AM rates of 100 and 1000Hz was positively correlated with the size of the cortical lesion. Substantial deficits were found only in animals with lesions that included secondary as well as primary auditory cortical areas. The results show that the rat's auditory cortex is important for processing sinusoidal AM and that its contribution is most apparent at high modulation rates. The data suggest that the auditory cortex is a crucial structure for maintaining normal sensitivity to temporal modulation of an auditory stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629425     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Adaptive categorization of sound frequency does not require the auditory cortex in rats.

Authors:  Tyler L Gimenez; Maja Lorenc; Santiago Jaramillo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neonatal nicotine exposure impairs development of auditory temporal processing.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Anna Hansen; Liyan Zhang; Jianzhong Lu; Daniel Stolzberg; Kari Suzanne Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marcia W Raggio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Responses in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig to concurrent harmonic series and the effect of inactivation of descending controls.

Authors:  Kyle T Nakamoto; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  State-dependent population coding in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Marius Pachitariu; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Maneesh Sahani; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Detection of low salience whisker stimuli requires synergy of tectal and thalamic sensory relays.

Authors:  Jeremy D Cohen; Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats.

Authors:  Owen R Floody; Ladislav Ouda; Benjamin A Porter; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-24

9.  Discrimination of brief speech sounds is impaired in rats with auditory cortex lesions.

Authors:  Benjamin A Porter; Tara R Rosenthal; Kamalini G Ranasinghe; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.