Literature DB >> 17627369

Langevin dynamics simulations of ds-DNA translocation through synthetic nanopores.

Christopher Forrey1, M Muthukumar.   

Abstract

We have implemented a coarse-grained model to study voltage-driven as-DNA translocation through nanopores located in synthetic membranes. The simulated trajectory of the DNA through the nanopores was calculated using Langevin dynamics. We present the results based on more than 120,000 individual translocations. We are particularly interested in this work in probing the physical basis of various experimentally observed--yet poorly understood--phenomena. Notably, we observe in our simulations the formation of ds-DNA hairpins, widely suspected to be the basis for quantized blockage. We study the translocation time, a measurable quantity crucially important in polyelectrolyte characterization, as a function of hairpin vertex location along the polymer backbone, finding that this behavior can be tuned to some degree by simulation parameters. We also study the voltage dependence of the tendency of hairpins to serve as the initiators of translocation events. Surprisingly, we find that the resulting probability depends vitally upon whether the events counted are ultimately successful or not. Further details lead us to propose that failed attempts in experimental translocation studies may be more common--and deceptive--than is generally recognized. We find the time taken by successful single file translocations to be directly proportional to the ratio of chain length to the applied voltage. Finally, we address a common yet puzzling phenomenon in translocation experiments: translocation events in which the current through the pore is highly, yet incompletely, blocked. We present the findings that offer a new explanation for such events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17627369     DOI: 10.1063/1.2746246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  17 in total

1.  Deciphering ionic current signatures of DNA transport through a nanopore.

Authors:  Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  How polymers translocate through pores: memory is important.

Authors:  Anatoly B Kolomeisky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Mimicking DNA stretching with the Static Mode method: shear stress versus transverse pulling stress.

Authors:  M Brut; A Estève; G Landa; M Djafari Rouhani
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Origin of translocation barriers for polyelectrolyte chains.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; M Muthukumar
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Origins and consequences of velocity fluctuations during DNA passage through a nanopore.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Fernando Albertorio; David P Hoogerheide; Jene A Golovchenko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Pore translocation of knotted DNA rings.

Authors:  Antonio Suma; Cristian Micheletti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of nanopore size on the flow-induced star polymer translocation.

Authors:  Qiaoyue Chen; Lili Zhang; Mingming Ding; Xiaozheng Duan; Yineng Huang; Tongfei Shi
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.890

8.  Conformation-dependent translocation of a star polymer through a nanochannel.

Authors:  Zhu Liu; Jiannan Liu; Mengying Xiao; Rong Wang; Yeng-Long Chen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Theory for polymer analysis using nanopore-based single-molecule mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joseph E Reiner; John J Kasianowicz; Brian J Nablo; Joseph W F Robertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Slowing and controlling the translocation of DNA in a solid-state nanopore.

Authors:  Binquan Luan; Gustavo Stolovitzky; Glenn Martyna
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 7.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.