Literature DB >> 29353354

Relationship among aqueous copper half-lives and responses of Pimephales promelas to a series of copper sulfate pentahydrate concentrations.

Alyssa J Calomeni1, Ciera M Kinley2, Tyler D Geer2, Kyla J Iwinski2, Maas Hendrikse2, John H Rodgers2.   

Abstract

Copper algaecide exposures in situ are often of shorter duration than exposures for static toxicity experiments because aqueous concentrations in situ dissipate as a function of site-specific fate processes. Consequently, responses of organisms to static copper exposures may overestimate effects following in situ exposures. To understand the role of exposure duration for altering responses, Pimephales promelas survival was compared following static (96 h) and pulse (1.5, 4, 8, and 15 h half-lives) exposures of CuSO4•5H2O. Copper concentrations sorbed by fry indicated a consequence of different exposures. Responses of P. promelas to static exposures resulted in 96 h LC50s of 166 µgCu/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 142-189 µgCu/L) as soluble copper and 162 µgCu/L (CI, 140-183 µgCu/L) as acid soluble copper. Relative to static 96 h LC50s, exposures with half-lives of 1.5, 4 and 8 h resulted in LC50s 10, 3 and 2 times greater, respectively, for responses measured 96 h after exposure initiation. Copper concentrations extracted from fry exposed for 1.5, 4 and 8 h half-lives were less than the static experiment. However, copper sorbed by fry in the 15 h half-life experiment was not different than the static experiment. The relationship between 96 h LC50 and 1/half-life was expressed using the equations y = 116 + 1360 × (R2 = 0.97) for soluble copper and y = 147 + 1620 × (R2 = 0.98) for acid soluble copper. Incorporation of exposure duration for predictions of P. promelas responses to copper pulse exposures increases prediction accuracy by an order of magnitude.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algaecides; Non-target species; Pulse exposure; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29353354     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-018-1893-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  10 in total

1.  Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical basis.

Authors:  D M Di Toro; H E Allen; H L Bergman; J S Meyer; P R Paquin; R C Santore
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Modes of action in ecotoxicology: their role in body burdens, species sensitivity, QSARs, and mixture effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Joop L M Hermens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  A review of aquatic weed biology and management research conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service.

Authors:  Lars W J Anderson
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Prediction of time-dependent PAH toxicity in Hyalella azteca using a damage assessment model.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeon Lee; Peter F Landrum; Chul-Hwan Koh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Simplified models to analyse time- and dose-dependent responses of populations to toxicants.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Kouichi Goka
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  From simple toxicological models to prediction of toxic effects in time.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Comparative toxicity of sodium carbonate peroxyhydrate to freshwater organisms.

Authors:  Tyler D Geer; Ciera M Kinley; Kyla J Iwinski; Alyssa J Calomeni; John H Rodgers
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Comparative responses of freshwater organisms to exposures of a commercial naphthenic acid.

Authors:  Ciera M Kinley; Andrew D McQueen; John H Rodgers
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Algicidal effectiveness of Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate and margins of safety associated with their use.

Authors:  C L Murray-Gulde; J E Heatley; A L Schwartzman; J H Rodgers
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Toxicity and bioavailability of copper herbicides (Clearigate, Cutrine-Plus, and copper sulfate) to freshwater animals.

Authors:  B J Mastin; J H Rodgers
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.804

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.