Literature DB >> 17624053

Patients'and doctors' views of using the schedule for individual quality of life in clinical practice.

Asa Kettis-Lindblad1, Lena Ring, Elisabeth Widmark, Preben Bendtsen, Bengt Glimelius.   

Abstract

This study explored patients' and oncologists' perceptions of using a computer-administered, individualized quality-of-life (QOL) instrument to support an oncologic consultation. Twenty patients with gastrointestinal cancer (50% female; mean age 60 years) at two hospitals in Sweden completed the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weight (SEIQoL-DW) and the Disease-Related (DR) SEIQoL-DW and brought the results to the consultation. Afterwards, interviews were conducted with all patients and six of eight doctors. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using an interpretivist approach. Most patients and doctors believed that the instrument would facilitate detection of patients' areas of concern and would support monitoring of patients' QOL. This tool may empower the patient, give the doctor a broader picture of the patient, and influence clinical decision-making. The SEIQoL-DW may be a systematic method of stimulating patient-centered care. It apparently encourages patients to reflect upon their own situation and allows them to be seen as whole persons. However, further quantitative evaluation of the intervention's outcomes is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Support Oncol        ISSN: 1544-6794


  12 in total

1.  Measurement of individualised quality of life amongst young people with indicated personality disorder during emerging adulthood using the SEIQoL-DW.

Authors:  Paul Farrand; Joanne Woodford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW.

Authors:  L Wettergren; A Kettis-Lindblad; M Sprangers; L Ring
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Completing a Questionnaire at Home Prior to Needs Assessment in General Practice: A Qualitative Study of Cancer Patients' Experience.

Authors:  Susanne Thayssen; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Jens Søndergaard; Mette Terp Høybye; Palle Mark Christensen; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Rachel Campbell; Angela Ju; Madeleine T King; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Healthcare Professionals' Preferences and Perceived Barriers for Routine Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Oncology Practice: Moving Toward International Processes of Change.

Authors:  Sasja A Schepers; Lotte Haverman; Sima Zadeh; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lori Wiener
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Enhanced patient reported outcome measurement suitable for head and neck cancer follow-up clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-06-13

7.  Domains of quality of life freely expressed by cancer patients and their caregivers: contribution of the SEIQoL.

Authors:  Zeinab Hamidou; Karine Baumstarck; Olivier Chinot; Fabrice Barlesi; Sébastien Salas; Tanguy Leroy; Pascal Auquier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Quality of life assessments in clinical practice using either the EORTC-QLQ-C30 or the SEIOQL-DW: a randomized study.

Authors:  Åsa Kettis; Hanna Fagerlind; Jan-Erik Frödin; Bengt Glimelius; Lena Ring
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-14

9.  Do generic utility measures capture what is important to the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Ayse Kuspinar; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 10.  How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh; Kate Gooding; Elizabeth Gibbons; Sonia Dalkin; Judy Wright; Jose Valderas; Nick Black
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.